Literature DB >> 17372657

Auditory motion affects visual motion perception in a speeded discrimination task.

Daniel Sanabria1, Juan Lupiáñez, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

Transient auditory stimuli have been shown to influence the perception of ambiguous 2D visual motion displays (the bouncing-disks effect; e.g. Sekuler et al. in Nature 385:308, 1997). The question addressed here was whether continuous moving auditory stimuli can also influence visual motion perception under the same experimental conditions. In Experiment 1, we used a modification of Sanabria et al.'s (Exp Brain Res 157:537-541, 2004) paradigm (involving an indirect behavioural measure of the bouncing-disks effect), in which the 2D visual display was presented together with either a brief tone, a continuous moving sound, or in the absence of any form of auditory stimulation. Crucially, the results showed that, together with the effect of the brief tone on bouncing trials, the presence of the continuous moving sound speeded-up participants' responses on streaming trials as compared to the brief tone or no sound conditions. The results of a second experiment revealed that the effect of the continuous moving sound reported in Experiment 1 was not caused simply by the presence of continuous auditory stimulation per se.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17372657     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0919-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

1.  Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals.

Authors:  G F Meyer; S M Wuerger
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-08-08       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Bouncing or streaming? Exploring the influence of auditory cues on the interpretation of ambiguous visual motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Angel Correa; Juan Lupiáñez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction.

Authors:  J Heron; D Whitaker; P V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Cross-modal dynamic capture: congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Perceiving object motion using vision and touch.

Authors:  Thomas W James; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Analysis of a constraint on perception, cognition, and development: one object, one place, one time.

Authors:  Felice L Bedford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Directional bias in the perception of translating patterns.

Authors:  B I Bertenthal; T Banton; A Bradbury
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Extrapolation of motion path in human visual perception.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; S M Anstis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms.

Authors:  William Prinzmetal; Christin McCool; Samuel Park
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-02

10.  Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization.

Authors:  Peter W Battaglia; Robert A Jacobs; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  4 in total

1.  Rubber hand presentation modulates visuotactile interference effect especially in persons with high autistic traits.

Authors:  Makoto Wada; Masakazu Ide
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Acoustic facilitation of object movement detection during self-motion.

Authors:  F J Calabro; S Soto-Faraco; L M Vaina
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Auditory motion information drives visual motion perception.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Yoichi Sugita; Yuko Manaka; Shuichi Sakamoto; Yôiti Suzuki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of virtual speaker density and room reverberation on spatiotemporal thresholds of audio-visual motion coherence.

Authors:  Narayan Sankaran; Johahn Leung; Simon Carlile
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.