Literature DB >> 11483640

Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact.

S Michie1, M Bobrow, T M Marteau.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether, following predictive genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), children or adults receiving positive results experience clinically significant levels of anxiety or depression, and whether children receiving positive results experience higher levels of anxiety or depression than adults receiving positive results.
DESIGN: Two studies, one cross sectional and one prospective. SAMPLE: 208 unaffected subjects (148 adults and 60 children) at risk for FAP who have undergone genetic testing since 1990. DEPENDENT VARIABLES: anxiety, depression; independent variables: test results, demographic measures, psychological resources (optimism, self-esteem).
RESULTS: Study 1. In children receiving positive results, mean scores for anxiety and depression were within the normal range. There was a trend for children receiving positive results to be more anxious and depressed than those receiving negative results. In adults, mean scores for anxiety were within the normal range for those receiving negative results, but were in the clinical range for those receiving positive results, with 43% (95% CI 23-65) of the latter having scores in this range. Regardless of test result, adults were more likely to be clinically anxious if they were low in optimism or self-esteem. Children receiving positive or negative results did not experience greater anxiety or depression than adults. Study 2. For children receiving a positive test result, mean scores for anxiety, depression, and self-esteem were unchanged over the year following the result, while mean anxiety scores decreased and self-esteem increased after receipt of a negative test result over the same period of time.
CONCLUSION: Children, as a group, did not show clinically significant distress over the first year following predictive genetic testing. Adults were more likely to be clinically anxious if they received a positive result or were low in optimism or self-esteem, with interacting effects. The association between anxiety, self-esteem, and optimism suggests that counselling should be targeted, not only at those with positive test results, but also at those low in psychological resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11483640      PMCID: PMC1734924          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.38.8.519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  20 in total

1.  Commentary: weighing burdens and benefits rather than competence.

Authors:  G Geller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-17

2.  Laboratory policies and practices for the genetic testing of children: a survey of the Helix network.

Authors:  D C Wertz; P R Reilly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Genetic testing for cancer in children. Short-term psychological effect.

Authors:  A M Codori; G M Petersen; P A Boyd; J Brandt; F M Giardiello
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1996-11

4.  Risk-perception: differences between adolescents and adults.

Authors:  L D Cohn; S Macfarlane; C Yanez; W K Imai
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 5.  The new genetics. Psychological responses to genetic testing.

Authors:  T M Marteau; R T Croyle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-28

6.  Prediction of psychological functioning one year after the predictive test for Huntington's disease and impact of the test result on reproductive decision making.

Authors:  M Decruyenaere; G Evers-Kiebooms; A Boogaerts; J J Cassiman; T Cloostermans; K Demyttenaere; R Dom; J P Fryns; H Van den Berghe
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: preliminary findings.

Authors:  R T Croyle; K R Smith; J R Botkin; B Baty; J Nash
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.

Authors:  M Horowitz; N Wilner; W Alvarez
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  Genetic testing for children and adolescents. Who decides?

Authors:  D C Wertz; J H Fanos; P R Reilly
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Parents' responses to predictive genetic testing in their children: report of a single case study.

Authors:  S Michie; V McDonald; M Bobrow; C McKeown; T Marteau
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.318

View more
  46 in total

1.  Predictive genetic testing: high risk expectations in the face of low risk information.

Authors:  Susan Michie; John Weinman; Julie Miller; Veronica Collins; Jane Halliday; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-02

2.  A qualitative study exploring genetic counsellors' experiences of counselling children.

Authors:  Fiona Ulph; James Leong; Cris Glazebrook; Ellen Townsend
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Predictive genetic testing: mediators and moderators of anxiety.

Authors:  Susan Michie; David P French; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review.

Authors:  R Timman; T Stijnen; A Tibben
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 5.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

6.  Predictive testing of eighteen year olds: counseling challenges.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Elly Lynch; Lesley Spencer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Living with genetic risk: effect on adolescent self-concept.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Gail A Spiridigliozzi; Elizabeth Melvin; Deborah V Dawson; Ave M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  Psychosocial impact of familial adenomatous polyposis on young adults: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shab Mireskandari; Jennifer Sangster; Bettina Meiser; Belinda Thewes; Claire Groombridge; Allan Spigelman; Lesley Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Genetic testing of children for familial cancers: a comparative legal perspective on consent, communication of information and confidentiality.

Authors:  Roy Gilbar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts; L Adrienne Cupples; Norman R Relkin; Peter J Whitehouse; Tamsen Brown; Susan LaRusse Eckert; Melissa Butson; A Dessa Sadovnick; Kimberly A Quaid; Clara Chen; Robert Cook-Deegan; Lindsay A Farrer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.