Literature DB >> 9028816

Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: preliminary findings.

R T Croyle1, K R Smith, J R Botkin, B Baty, J Nash.   

Abstract

The short-term psychological responses of 60 adult women tested for a BRCA1 gene mutation associated with a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer were investigated. Participants were members of a large kindred enrolled in an ongoing prospective study of the psychosocial impact of genetic testing. Initial results from participants who completed both the pretest baseline and the 1-2 week posttest follow-up interviews are reported. Gene mutation carriers manifested significantly higher levels of test-related psychological distress, as measured by the Impact of Event Scale, when compared with noncarriers. The highest levels of test-related distress were observed among mutation carriers with no history of cancer or cancer-related surgery. Although general distress (state anxiety) declined after testing, carriers were more distressed than noncarriers at follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9028816     DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.16.1.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  57 in total

1.  Presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: how distressing are the pre-test weeks? Rotterdam/Leiden Genetics Working Group.

Authors:  L N Lodder; P G Frets; R W Trijsburg; E J Meijers-Heijboer; J G Klijn; H J Duivenvoorden; A Tibben; A Wagner; C A van der Meer; P Devilee; C J Cornelisse; M F Niermeijer
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review.

Authors:  R Timman; T Stijnen; A Tibben
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Long-term reactions to genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: does time heal women's concerns?

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Jill E Stopfer; Jasmine McDonald; Benita Weathers; Aliya Collier; Andrea B Troxel; Susan Domchek
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Psychosocial Adjustment in School-age Girls With a Family History of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Lisa Schwartz; Brian Egleston; Colleen Burke Sands; Wendy K Chung; Gord Glendon; Jasmine A McDonald; Cynthia Moore; Paula Rauch; Lisa Tuchman; Irene L Andrulis; Saundra S Buys; Caren J Frost; Theresa H M Keegan; Julia A Knight; Mary Beth Terry; Esther M John; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Psychological functioning before predictive testing for Huntington's disease: the role of the parental disease, risk perception, and subjective proximity of the disease.

Authors:  M Decruyenaere; G Evers-Kiebooms; A Boogaerts; J J Cassiman; T Cloostermans; K Demyttenaere; R Dom; J P Fryns
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Interpersonal responses among sibling dyads tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations.

Authors:  Heidi A Hamann; Timothy W Smith; Ken R Smith; Robert T Croyle; John M Ruiz; John C Kircher; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Psychological factors associated with emotional responses to receiving genetic risk information.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Clare Wilkinson; Jim Turner; Kate Brain; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Gethin Griffith; Barbara France; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Psychometric testing of the Impact of Event Scale-Chinese Version (IES-C) in oral cancer patients in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shu-Ching Chen; Yeur-Hur Lai; Chun-Ta Liao; Chia-Chin Lin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Women's perceptions of the personal and family impact of genetic cancer risk assessment: focus group findings.

Authors:  Deborah J MacDonald; Linda Sarna; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  A prospective, longitudinal study of the impact of GJB2/GJB6 genetic testing on the beliefs and attitudes of parents of deaf and hard-of-hearing infants.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Ariadna Martinez; Michelle Fox; Jin Zhou; Nina Shapiro; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne W Grody; Lisa A Schimmenti
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.