Literature DB >> 8078166

Genetic testing for children and adolescents. Who decides?

D C Wertz1, J H Fanos, P R Reilly.   

Abstract

In the future there is likely to be a large array of DNA-based tests to diagnose single-gene disorders and to identify predispositions to genetically influenced disorders. This article focuses on ethical, legal, and psychological implications of testing healthy children and adolescents for such disorders. Testing may offer medical or psychological benefits but may harm parent-child bonds or the child's self-concept. Clinicians may encounter situations where they must weigh the child's or adolescent's wishes against wishes of parents. We examine the legal history and current status of minors as health care consumers; psychosocial research on their maturity to make choices; impact of testing on intrafamilial relationships; views of national commissions on appropriate ages of assent and full informed consent; ethical and legal requirements for competence in children and adolescents; and disclosure of genetic information. We propose guidelines for predictive genetic testing and counseling of children and discuss risks and benefits of testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects; President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8078166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  53 in total

1.  Genetic testing in adoption. The American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Committee and The American College of Medical Genetics Social, Ethical, and Legal Issues Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Withholding life-sustaining treatment: are adolescents competent to make these decisions?

Authors:  C Doig; E Burgess
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Screening for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  W Hyer; J M Fell
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Fabry disease in genetic counseling practice: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Robin L Bennett; Kimberly A Hart; Erin O'Rourke; John A Barranger; Jack Johnson; Kay D MacDermot; Gregory M Pastores; Robert D Steiner; Ravi Thadhani
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

Review 6.  Potential Uses and Inherent Challenges of Using Genome-Scale Sequencing to Augment Current Newborn Screening.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berg; Cynthia M Powell
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 7.  Ethical issues in neonatal and pediatric clinical trials.

Authors:  Naomi Laventhal; Beth A Tarini; John Lantos
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 3.278

Review 8.  Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.302

9.  Attitudes of health care trainees about genetics and disability: issues of access, health care communication, and decision making.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond; Carol J Gill; Patrick Semik; Kristi L Kirschner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Attitudes towards bipolar disorder and predictive genetic testing among patients and providers.

Authors:  L B Smith; B Sapers; V I Reus; N B Freimer
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.