Literature DB >> 21212440

Estimating the unknown parameters of the natural history of metachronous colorectal cancer using discrete-event simulation.

Fatih Safa Erenay1, Oguzhan Alagoz1, Ritesh Banerjee2, Robert R Cima3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Some aspects of the natural history of metachronous colorectal cancer (MCRC), such as the rate of progression from adenomatous polyp to MCRC, are unknown. The objective of this study is to estimate a set of parameters revealing some of these unknown characteristics of MCRC.
METHODS: The authors developed a computer simulation model that mimics the progression of MCRC for a 5-year period following the treatment of primary colorectal cancer (CRC). They obtained the inputs of the simulation model using longitudinal data for 284 CRC patients from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester.
RESULTS: Five-year MCRC incidence and all-cause mortality were 7.4% and 12.7% in the patient cohort, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that 5-year MCRC incidence was associated with gender (P = 0.05), whereas both all-cause and CRC-related mortalities were associated with age (P < 0.001 and P = 0.01). Estimated annual probabilities of progression from adenomatous polyp to MCRC and from MCRC to metastatic MCRC were 0.14 and 0.28, respectively. Annual probabilities of mortality after MCRC and metastatic MCRC treatments were estimated to be 0.06 and 0.26, respectively. The estimated annual probability of mortality due to undetected MCRC was 0.16.
CONCLUSIONS: The results imply that MCRC, especially in women, may be more common than suggested by previous studies. In addition, statistics derived from the clinical data and results of the simulation model indicate that gender and age affect the progression of MCRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21212440      PMCID: PMC3117014          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10391809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  36 in total

1.  Guidelines for follow up after resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J H Scholefield; R J Steele
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Surveillance strategies after curative treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  David G Pfister; Al B Benson; Mark R Somerfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance.

Authors:  S Vijan; E W Hwang; T P Hofer; R A Hayward
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  An empiric estimate of the value of life: updating the renal dialysis cost-effectiveness standard.

Authors:  Chris P Lee; Glenn M Chertow; Stefanos A Zenios
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Right-sided shift found in metachronous colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  G Nusko; U Mansmann; G Wiest; W Brueckl; T Kirchner; E G Hahn
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Gender differences in stage-adjusted bladder cancer survival.

Authors:  N A Mungan; K K Aben; M P Schoenberg; O Visser; J W Coebergh; J A Witjes; L A Kiemeney
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Race, socioeconomic status and stage at diagnosis for five common malignancies.

Authors:  Kendra L Schwartz; Heather Crossley-May; Fawn D Vigneau; Karl Brown; Mousumi Banerjee
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Fecal DNA testing compared with conventional colorectal cancer screening methods: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth Song; A Mark Fendrick; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.

Authors:  Sidney Winawer; Robert Fletcher; Douglas Rex; John Bond; Randall Burt; Joseph Ferrucci; Theodore Ganiats; Theodore Levin; Steven Woolf; David Johnson; Lynne Kirk; Scott Litin; Clifford Simmang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Adenoma recurrences after resection of colorectal carcinoma: results from the Southwest Oncology Group 9041 calcium chemoprevention pilot study.

Authors:  David Z J Chu; Kari Chansky; David S Alberts; Frank L Meyskens; Cecilia M Fenoglio-Preiser; Saul E Rivkin; Glenn M Mills; Jeffrey K Giguere; Gary E Goodman; James L Abbruzzese; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  13 in total

1.  Design and validation of a data simulation model for longitudinal healthcare data.

Authors:  Richard E Murray; Patrick B Ryan; Stephanie J Reisinger
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

2.  Cost-effectiveness of alternative colonoscopy surveillance strategies to mitigate metachronous colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  Fatih Safa Erenay; Oguzhan Alagoz; Ritesh Banerjee; Adnan Said; Robert R Cima
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Using Active Learning for Speeding up Calibration in Simulation Models.

Authors:  Mucahit Cevik; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Natasha K Stout; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Mark Craven; Oguzhan Alagoz
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 4.  Do the benefits outweigh the side effects of colorectal cancer surveillance? A systematic review.

Authors:  Knut Magne Augestad; Johnie Rose; Benjamin Crawshaw; Gregory Cooper; Conor Delaney
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15

5.  Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--2.

Authors:  Mark Roberts; Louise B Russell; A David Paltiel; Michael Chambers; Phil McEwan; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer surveillance: what's new and what's next.

Authors:  Johnie Rose; Knut Magne Augestad; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Plasmode simulation for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiologic methods in complex healthcare databases.

Authors:  Jessica M Franklin; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Jennifer M Polinski; Jeremy A Rassen
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Multiobjective Calibration of Disease Simulation Models Using Gaussian Processes.

Authors:  Aditya Sai; Carolina Vivas-Valencia; Thomas F Imperiale; Nan Kong
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Nonidentifiability in Model Calibration and Implications for Medical Decision Making.

Authors:  Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Richard F MacLehose; Yadira Peralta; Karen M Kuntz; Eva A Enns
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer following a primary colorectal cancer: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Harindra Jayasekara; Jeanette C Reece; Daniel D Buchanan; Christophe Rosty; S Ghazaleh Dashti; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Ingrid M Winship; Finlay A Macrae; Alex Boussioutas; Graham G Giles; Dennis J Ahnen; Jan Lowery; Graham Casey; Robert W Haile; Steven Gallinger; Loic Le Marchand; Polly A Newcomb; Noralane M Lindor; John L Hopper; Susan Parry; Mark A Jenkins; Aung Ko Win
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 7.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.