Literature DB >> 29282495

Detection rate and proximal shift tendency of adenomas and serrated polyps: a retrospective study of 62,560 colonoscopies.

Shuling Chen1,2, Kaiyu Sun3, Kang Chao4, Yuli Sun1, Liru Hong5, Zijin Weng1, Yi Cui1, Minhu Chen1, Shenghong Zhang6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to estimate the detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps and to identify proximalization and associate risk factors in patients from Southern China.
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy from 2004 to 2013 in Guangzhou were included. The proportions of proximal adenomas to advanced adenomas and serrated polyps were compared and potential predictors were evaluated.
RESULTS: Colonoscopies (n = 62,560) were performed, and 11,427 patients were diagnosed with polyps. Detection rates for adenomas, hyperplastic polyps, and serrated adenomas were 12.0, 2.5, and 0.2 patients per 100 colonoscopies. When comparing the 1st (2004-2008) to the 2nd period (2009-2013), adenoma and serrated polyp detection in proximal and distal colon both increased significantly (proximal colon [adenoma 3.9 vs. 6.1 patients/100 colonoscopies, P < 0.001; serrated polyp 0.4 vs. 1.1 patients/100 colonoscopies, P < 0.001]; distal colon [adenoma 6.6 vs. 7.2 patients/100 colonoscopies, P = 0.003; serrated polyp 1.2 vs. 2.4 patients/100 colonoscopies, P < 0.001]). Advanced adenoma detection increased over these two periods only in proximal colon (1st vs. 2nd period: 1.5 vs. 2.4 patients/100 colonoscopies, P < 0.001), not the distal colon (P = 0.114). Multivariate analyses showed that diagnostic period was an independent predictor for adenoma proximalization (OR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.25-1.48, P < 0.001), but not for advanced adenomas (P = 0.117) or serrated polyps (P = 0.928).
CONCLUSIONS: Adenomas and serrated polyps were increasingly detected throughout the colon, whereas advanced adenomas were only in proximal colon. A proximal shift tendency detected by colonoscopy was observed for adenomas, but not advanced adenomas or serrated polyps, in Southern China. The screening for proximal polyps should be emphasized and colonoscopy might be a preferred initial screening tool.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma; Colorectal carcinoma; Detection rate; Proximal shift; Serrated polyp

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29282495     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2951-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  38 in total

1.  The presence of large serrated polyps increases risk for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sakiko Hiraoka; Jun Kato; Shigeatsu Fujiki; Eisuke Kaji; Tamiya Morikawa; Takatoshi Murakami; Toru Nawa; Motoaki Kuriyama; Toshio Uraoka; Nobuya Ohara; Kazuhide Yamamoto
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Screening colonoscopy in Chinese and Western patients: a comparative study.

Authors:  Maw-Soan Soon; Richard A Kozarek; Kamran Ayub; Anny Soon; Tin-Yu Lin; Otto S Lin
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Rightward shift of colorectal cancer in Italy during the past three decades.

Authors:  C Cucino; F Parente; G Bianchi Porro
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Daniel A Leffler; Rakhi Kheraj; Arjun Bhansali; Hanako Yamanaka; Naama Neeman; Sunil Sheth; Mandeep Sawhney; J Thomas Lamont; Mark D Aronson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Prevalence of adenomas and sessile serrated adenomas in Chinese compared with Caucasians.

Authors:  Vivek Kumbhari; Jason Behary; Jason Minco Hui
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.029

6.  Higher prevalence of proximal colon polyps and villous histology in African-Americans undergoing colonoscopy at a single equal access center.

Authors:  Christian S Jackson; Kenneth J Vega
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12

7.  The anatomical distribution of colorectal polyps at colonoscopy.

Authors:  K Patel; N E Hoffman
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Influence of demographics on colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gamal Mostafa; Brent D Matthews; H James Norton; Kent W Kercher; Ronald F Sing; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Prevalence of colorectal neoplasms in Asian Americans.

Authors:  Khoa D Lam; Ruel T Garcia; Long H Nguyen; Huy Trinh; George Triadafilopoulos; Jeanine T Phan; Khanh Nguyen; Huy Nguyen; Aijaz Ahmed; Mindie H Nguyen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Prevalence and features of colorectal lesions among Hispanics: A hospital-based study.

Authors:  Hassan Ashktorab; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Edward Lee; Marcia Cruz-Correa; Amita Ghuman; Mehdi Nouraie; Hassan Brim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the short-term efficacy of local analgesic (lidocaine) and opioid analgesic (sufentanil) on patients with centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hang Yang; Honglin Chen; Bing Hu
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Detection of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasia by Multi-target Stool DNA.

Authors:  Derek W Ebner; Jason D Eckmann; Kelli N Burger; Douglas W Mahoney; Jamie Bering; Allon Kahn; Eduardo A Rodriguez; David O Prichard; Michael B Wallace; Sunanda V Kane; Lila J Finney Rutten; Suryakanth R Gurudu; John B Kisiel
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.488

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.