Literature DB >> 21475455

Telesurgery: windows of opportunity.

Sulbha Arora1, Gautam N Allahbadia.   

Abstract

Minimally Invasive Surgery is the most important revolution in surgical technique since the early 1900s. Its development was facilitated by the introduction of miniaturized video cameras with good image reproduction. The marvels of electronic and information technology have strengthened the biochemical and molecular power of diagnosis and the surgical and medical management of gynecology, transforming the very practice of medical science into a reality that could barely be envisaged two decades ago. We now enter the age of Robotics, Telesurgery, and Therapeutic Cloning. This dynamic process of reform continues to deliver practitioners with information, ideas and tools that spell answers to some of the most pressing dilemmas in clinical management. New technology will provide us with better opportunities of vision of the operative field, such as 3-D Endoscopy. Other promising technologies such as incorporation of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, laser-based technology or assisted optical coherence tomography will not only enhance better visualization of the surgical field, but also discriminate the pathologic tissue from the normal one, enabling the surgeon to excise the pathologic tissue accurately. Pain mapping and photodiagnosis offer a new direction in the diagnosis of microscopic endometriosis. Better detection of the disease results in higher chances of success following treatment.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21475455      PMCID: PMC3068656     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)        ISSN: 1658-3639


  27 in total

Review 1.  Virtual reality simulators: current status in acquisition and assessment of surgical skills.

Authors:  Peter H Cosman; Patrick C Cregan; Christopher J Martin; John A Cartmill
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.872

2.  Does training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance?

Authors:  G Ahlberg; T Heikkinen; L Iselius; C-E Leijonmarck; J Rutqvist; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic surgery: is it for you?

Authors:  Mark A Talamini
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2002

4.  Face-, expert, and referent validity of the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Training the novice in laparoscopy. More challenge is better.

Authors:  M R Ali; Y Mowery; B Kaplan; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Optical coherence tomography for optical biopsy. Properties and demonstration of vascular pathology.

Authors:  M E Brezinski; G J Tearney; B E Bouma; J A Izatt; M R Hee; E A Swanson; J F Southern; J G Fujimoto
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Pain referral patterns in the pelvis.

Authors:  L A Demco
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2000-05

9.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study.

Authors:  M Degueldre; J Vandromme; P T Huong; G B Cadière
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  MR endoscopy: preliminary experience in human trials.

Authors:  D R Feldman; D P Kulling; R H Hawes; C L Kay; V R Muckenfuss; P B Cotton; D E Bohning; J W Young
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.