Literature DB >> 9148876

Comparison of laparoscopic imaging systems and conditions using a knot-tying task.

F Tendick1, S Bhoyrul, L W Way.   

Abstract

Pilot experiments to determine the important factors in the engineering of laparoscopic (videoscopic) imaging systems are described in this paper. In the first set of experiments, three videoscopic systems were compared by using a knot-tying task: monoscopic, monoscopic with digital contrast enhancement, and stereoscopic. Direct viewing was used as a control. In both experienced and novice subject groups, no difference was found in completion time or errors between the videoscopic conditions. Performance with direct viewing was significantly better, however, indicating that there are factors in videoscopic imaging that degrade perception or distort the relationship between vision and motor response. In the second set of experiments, the effects of contrast and spatial resolution were examined by varying working distance and camera exposure while experienced subjects tied knots on high- and low-contrast surfaces. Good contrast was found to be most important at longer working distances. This result shows that performance of knot tying, a complex task, is affected by contrast sensitivity, which is a fundamental property of human vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9148876     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0150(1997)2:1<24::AID-IGS5>3.0.CO;2-P

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Aided Surg        ISSN: 1092-9088


  7 in total

Review 1.  Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems.

Authors:  E Berber; A E Siperstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The role of mental rotation and memory scanning on the performance of laparoscopic skills: a study on the effect of camera rotational angle.

Authors:  J Conrad; A H Shah; C M Divino; S Schluender; B Gurland; E Shlasko; A Szold
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Learning kinematic mappings in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; Carla M Pugh; James L Patton; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

4.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera.

Authors:  Seong-Ho Kong; Byung-Mo Oh; Hongman Yoon; Hye Seong Ahn; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Sun Geun Chung; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Learning Kinematic Constraints in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Carla M Pugh; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.487

6.  Micro-movements of varying difficulties: wrist and arm movements.

Authors:  Jason B Boyle; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The investigation of laparoscopic instrument movement control and learning effect.

Authors:  Chiuhsiang Joe Lin; Hung-Jen Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.