Literature DB >> 16228857

Evaluation of surgical performance with standard rigid and flexible-tip laparoscopes.

J M Perrone1, C D Ames, Y Yan, J Landman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flexible-tip laparoscopes have recently been introduced into clinical practice, with the goal of improving surgeon performance during complex laparoscopic procedures. We used objective and subjective performance parameters to compare standard rigid 0 degrees and 30 degrees lens laparoscopes two flexible-tip laparoscopes in an in vitro model.
METHODS: Twenty-nine subjects with varied levels of surgical experience performed complex laparoscopic tasks in three different models simulating (a) prostate dissection from the rectum, (b) cystic duct clipping, and (c) distal posterior rectum dissection. Each task was performed using two Storz rigid laparoscopes (0 degrees and 30 degrees) and two flexible-tip laparoscopes, the Olympus LTF-V3 and the Fujinon EL2-TF310. The sequence of application of the two flexible-tip laparoscopes was randomized. In each case, an experienced laparoscopic camera driver controlled the field of vision. Time to complete each task, operative precision, and subjective surgeon rating scores were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a two-sided fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: In all three models, the flexible laparoscopes offered no advantage in terms of procedure time, surgical precision, or subjective surgeon rating score when compared with the 30 degrees lens rigid laparoscope. The 30 degrees rigid lens laparoscope and the two flexible-tip laparoscopes were superior to the 0 degrees lens rigid laparoscope for all parameters evaluated, with the exception of subjective rating in the cystic duct model and procedure time in the colorectal model.
CONCLUSION: In this in vitro experimental model, the flexible-tip laparoscopes found to have no advantage over the standard rigid 30 degrees lens laparoscope. These models were validated, as the 0 degrees lens rigid laparoscope was surpassed by the 30 degrees lens rigid laparoscope and the flexible-tip laparoscopes. Both flexible-tip laparoscopes produced similar results and excellent image quality, but some experience is required before their smooth application can be achieved.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16228857     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8282-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  5 in total

1.  Optical imaging technology in minimally invasive surgery. Current status and future directions.

Authors:  S A Boppart; T F Deutsch; D W Rattner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Advances in camera, video, and imaging technologies in laparoscopy.

Authors:  J Kourambas; G M Preminger
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  History of endoscopy: what lessons have we learned from the past?

Authors:  G Berci; K A Forde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems.

Authors:  E Berber; A E Siperstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Technology for minimal access surgery. Interview by Judy Jones.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-13
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Visual exposure using single-handed magnet-driven intra-abdominal wireless camera in minimal access surgery: is better than 30 degrees endoscope.

Authors:  Morkos Fakhry; Brendan Gallagher; Fernando Bello; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Teruo Kiyama; Itsuo Fujita; Hitoshi Kanno; Aya Tani; Toshiro Yoshiyuki; Shunji Kato; Takashi Tajiri; Adrian Barbul
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.452

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.