Literature DB >> 8678137

Microendoscopic surgery: a comparison of four microendoscopes and a review of the literature.

P N Fuller1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare four microendoscopes to evaluate their clinical and cost effectiveness. STUDY
DESIGN: The experience of 27 patients scheduled for diagnostic or minor operative procedures is reported. All patients had microendoscopic laparoscopy performed using the Medical Dynamics optical catheter (Englewood, Col.), the Origin Pixie microendoscope (Menlo Park, Calif.), the Imagyn Microlap (Laguna Niquel, Calif.), or the Karl Storz microendoscope (Culver City, Calif.). A 5 mm conventional laparoscope was used when visualization was inadequate.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients had tubal sterilization. Fourteen patients had diagnostic laparoscopy. For 22 patients the microendoscopes were adequate. The remaining 5 patients required the use of a 5 mm laparoscope to complete the procedure. Among the microendoscopes, the Imagyn Microlap was considered to have the best combination of field of vision, clinical adaptability, ease of operation, mode of sterilization, and operating cost. The 5 mm endoscope provided the best visualization at the lowest overall cost.
CONCLUSION: Microendoscopes are adequate for diagnostic and minor operative procedures. The 5 mm endoscope is the most clinically cost effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8678137     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70207-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

Review 1.  Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems.

Authors:  E Berber; A E Siperstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Mini-laparoscopic versus laparoscopic approach to appendectomy.

Authors:  G Mostafa; B D Matthews; R F Sing; K W Kercher; B T Heniford
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2001-10-31       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  The use of the 1 mm laparoscope to assist in port insertion in pelvic oncological surgery.

Authors:  Philippa Sangster; Thomas E J Ind
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-04-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.