Literature DB >> 11442080

Minimizing Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Modality Worklist patient/study selection errors.

P M Kuzmak1, R E Dayhoff.   

Abstract

Frequently when patient and study identification information (patient name, patient identification, date of birth, sex, and accession number) are manually entered at a modality, typographical errors occur that have to be corrected before the acquired images can be matched to the proper patient and study on a picture archiving and communication system (PACS). The Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) Modality Worklist service alleviates these problems by automatically transferring this data from the radiology information system (RIS) to the image acquisition modality. The technologist then does not have to manually re-enter the data to place it into the image files. With modality worklist, precise patient and study data are obtained and placed into the image headers with no typographical errors. When the images are sent to the PACS, they match the corresponding patient and study records, and are immediately incorporated into the electronic patient record. While modality worklist does replace the manual keying of the data and virtually eliminates typographical problems, it introduces a new source of human error: the incorrect selection of the patient and/or study from the computerized worklist, and the resultant mislabeling of the images. When these mislabeled images are sent to the PACS, they are immediately associated with the wrong patient and/or study, where they potentially may cause serious harm. The goal of this report is to raise awareness to this problem, to identify the major causes of these errors, and to offer some practical suggestions on how to minimize them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11442080      PMCID: PMC3452684          DOI: 10.1007/BF03190323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  4 in total

1.  Providing a complete online multimedia patient record.

Authors:  R E Dayhoff; P M Kuzmak; G Kirin; S Frank
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Transmission failure rate for computed tomography examinations in a filmless imaging department.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel; P Kuzmak; S Severance
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  DICOM modality worklist: an essential component in a PACS environment.

Authors:  M E Gale; D R Gale
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  The Department of Veterans Affairs integration of imaging into the healthcare enterprise using the VistA Hospital Information System and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine.

Authors:  P M Kuzmak; R E Dayhoff
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.056

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  System integration and DICOM image creation for PET-MR fusion.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Hsiao; Tsair Kao; Yu-Hua Fang; Jiunn-Kuen Wang; Wan-Yuo Guo; Liang-Hsiao Chao; Sang-Hue Yen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Study of Radiologic Technologists' Perceptions of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) Competence and Educational Issues in Western Australia.

Authors:  Daniel M Floyd; Errol R Trepp; Maryam Ipaki; Curtise K C Ng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  DICOM Standard Conformance in Veterinary Medicine in Germany: a Survey of Imaging Studies in Referral Cases.

Authors:  Andreas Brühschwein; Julius Klever; Tom Wilkinson; Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  High throughput image labeling on chest computed tomography by deep learning.

Authors:  Xiaoyong Wang; Pangyu Teng; Ashley Ontiveros; Jonathan G Goldin; Matthew S Brown
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-03-20

5.  Patient exam data reconciliation tool.

Authors:  Gloria Lobo-Stratton; Tyran Mercer; Raimund Polman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  One year's results from a server-based system for performing reject analysis and exposure analysis in computed radiography.

Authors:  A Kyle Jones; Raimund Polman; Charles E Willis; S Jeff Shepard
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Practice Guidelines for Ocular Telehealth-Diabetic Retinopathy, Third Edition.

Authors:  Mark B Horton; Christopher J Brady; Jerry Cavallerano; Michael Abramoff; Gail Barker; Michael F Chiang; Charlene H Crockett; Seema Garg; Peter Karth; Yao Liu; Clark D Newman; Siddarth Rathi; Veeral Sheth; Paolo Silva; Kristen Stebbins; Ingrid Zimmer-Galler
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 8.  Informatics and the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Richard G Jones; Owen A Johnson; Gifford Batstone
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2014-08

9.  Data Standards in Tele-radiology.

Authors:  Mansoor Fatehi; Reza Safdari; Marjan Ghazisaeidi; Mohamad Jebraeily; Mahdi Habibi-Koolaee
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2015-05-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.