Literature DB >> 25336763

Informatics and the clinical laboratory.

Richard G Jones1, Owen A Johnson2, Gifford Batstone3.   

Abstract

The nature of pathology services is changing under the combined pressures of increasing workloads, cost constraints and technological advancement. In the face of this, laboratory systems need to meet new demands for data exchange with clinical electronic record systems for test requesting and results reporting. As these needs develop, new challenges are emerging especially with respect to the format and content of the datasets which are being exchanged. If the potential for the inclusion of intelligent systems in both these areas is to be realised, the continued dialogue between clinicians and laboratory information specialists is of paramount importance. Requirements of information technology (IT) in pathology, now extend well beyond the provision of purely analytical data. With the aim of achieving seamless integration of laboratory data into the total clinical pathway, 'Informatics' - the art and science of turning data into useful information - is becoming increasingly important in laboratory medicine. Informatics is a powerful tool in pathology - whether in implementing processes for pathology modernisation, introducing new diagnostic modalities (e.g. proteomics, genomics), providing timely and evidence-based disease management, or enabling best use of limited and often costly resources. Providing appropriate information to empowered and interested patients - which requires critical assessment of the ever-increasing volume of information available - can also benefit greatly from appropriate use of informatics in enhancing self-management of long term conditions. The increasing demands placed on pathology information systems in the context of wider developmental change in healthcare delivery are explored in this review. General trends in medical informatics are reflected in current priorities for laboratory medicine, including the need for unified electronic records, computerised order entry, data security and recovery, and audit. We conclude that there is a need to rethink the architecture of pathology systems and in particular to address the changed environment in which electronic patient record systems are maturing rapidly. The opportunity for laboratory-based informaticians to work collaboratively with clinical systems developers to embed clinically intelligent decision support systems should not be missed.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25336763      PMCID: PMC4204239     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev        ISSN: 0159-8090


  36 in total

1.  The history of the Read Codes: the inaugural James Read Memorial Lecture 2011.

Authors:  Tim Benson
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2011

2.  Communication of structured medical information by computers: the Oxford experience.

Authors:  J McVittie; J D Kay
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1993

Review 3.  Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.

Authors:  C Main; T Moxham; J C Wyatt; J Kay; R Anderson; K Stein
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Keynote address--the innovator's prescription: an examination of the future of health care through the lenses of disruptive innovation.

Authors:  Jason Hwang
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  The mathematical basis of multivariate risk screening: with special reference to screening for Down's syndrome associated pregnancy.

Authors:  T M Reynolds; M D Penney
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.057

Review 6.  Analytical performance specifications: relating laboratory performance to quality required for intended clinical use.

Authors:  Daniel A Dalenberg; Patricia G Schryver; George G Klee
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.935

Review 7.  Prioritizing risk analysis quality control plans based on Sigma-metrics.

Authors:  Sten Westgard
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.935

8.  Electronic clinical laboratory test results data tables: lessons from Mini-Sentinel.

Authors:  Marsha A Raebel; Kevin Haynes; Tiffany S Woodworth; Gwyn Saylor; Elizabeth Cavagnaro; Kara O Coughlin; Lesley H Curtis; Mark G Weiner; Patrick Archdeacon; Jeffrey S Brown
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  ARGOS policy brief on semantic interoperability.

Authors:  Dipak Kalra; Mark Musen; Barry Smith; Werner Ceusters; Georges De Moor
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2011

Review 10.  The new European directive on in vitro diagnostics.

Authors:  Francesco Dati
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  5 in total

1.  The march of technology through the clinical laboratory and beyond.

Authors:  Andrew St John; Christopher Price
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2014-08

Review 2.  Existing and Emerging Technologies for Point-of-Care Testing.

Authors:  Andrew St John; Christopher P Price
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2014-08

3.  Genome Sequencing Technologies and Nursing: What Are the Roles of Nurses and Nurse Scientists?

Authors:  Jacquelyn Y Taylor; Michelle L Wright; Kathleen T Hickey; David E Housman
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Biases in electronic health record data due to processes within the healthcare system: retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Denis Agniel; Isaac S Kohane; Griffin M Weber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-04-30

5.  Health Care Analytics With Time-Invariant and Time-Variant Feature Importance to Predict Hospital-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury: Observational Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Horng-Ruey Chua; Kaiping Zheng; Anantharaman Vathsala; Kee-Yuan Ngiam; Hui-Kim Yap; Liangjian Lu; Ho-Yee Tiong; Amartya Mukhopadhyay; Graeme MacLaren; Shir-Lynn Lim; K Akalya; Beng-Chin Ooi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.