Literature DB >> 15359747

DICOM modality worklist: an essential component in a PACS environment.

M E Gale1, D R Gale.   

Abstract

The development and acceptance of the digital communication in medicine (DICOM) standard has become a basic requirement for the implementation of electronic imaging in radiology. DICOM is now evolving to provide a standard for electronic communication between radiology and other parts of the hospital enterprise. In a completely integrated filmless radiology department, there are 3 core computer systems, the picture archiving and communication system (PACS), the hospital or radiology information system (HIS, RIS), and the acquisition modality. Ideally, each would have bidirectional communication with the other 2 systems. At a minimum, a PACS must be able to receive and acknowledge receipt of image and demographic data from the modalities. Similarly, the modalities must be able to send images and demographic data to the PACS. Now that basic DICOM communication protocols for query or retrieval, storage, and print classes have become established through both conformance statements and intervendor testing, there has been an increase in interest in enhancing the functionality of communication between the 3 computers. Historically, demographic data passed to the PACS have been generated manually at the modality despite the existence of the same data on the HIS or RIS. In more current sophisticated implementations, acquisition modalities are able to receive patient and study-related data from the HIS or RIS. DICOM Modality Worklist is the missing electronic link that transfers this critical information between the acquisition modalities and the HIS or RIS. This report describes the concepts, issues, and impact of DICOM Modality Worklist implementation in a PACS environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 15359747      PMCID: PMC3452969          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  7 in total

1.  An automated PACS workstation interface: a timesaving enhancement.

Authors:  D R Gale; M E Gale; R K Schwartz; V V Muse; R E Walker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  A DICOM document-oriented approach to PACS infrastructure.

Authors:  F Behlen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  DICOM versus HL7 for modality interfacing.

Authors:  H Oosterwijk
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Large-scale PACS implementation.

Authors:  J A Carrino; P J Unkel; I D Miller; C L Bowser; M W Freckleton; T G Johnson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Experience implementing a DICOM 3.0 multivendor teleradiology network.

Authors:  B A Levine; K R Cleary; G S Norton; S K Mun
Journal:  Telemed J       Date:  1998

6.  An automated PACS image acquisition and recovery scheme for image integrity based on the DICOM standard.

Authors:  S L Lou; D R Hoogstrate; H K Huang
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  The Department of Veterans Affairs integration of imaging into the healthcare enterprise using the VistA Hospital Information System and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine.

Authors:  P M Kuzmak; R E Dayhoff
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.056

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  DICOM awareness of oral and maxillofacial radiologists in India.

Authors:  Kaustubh Sansare; Dharamveer Singh; Allan Farman; Freny Karjodkar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Minimizing Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Modality Worklist patient/study selection errors.

Authors:  P M Kuzmak; R E Dayhoff
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  [PACS: storage and retrieval of digital radiological image data].

Authors:  S Wirth; M Treitl; S Villain; A Lucke; S Nissen-Meyer; I Mittermaier; K-J Pfeifer; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Study of Radiologic Technologists' Perceptions of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) Competence and Educational Issues in Western Australia.

Authors:  Daniel M Floyd; Errol R Trepp; Maryam Ipaki; Curtise K C Ng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  DICOM Standard Conformance in Veterinary Medicine in Germany: a Survey of Imaging Studies in Referral Cases.

Authors:  Andreas Brühschwein; Julius Klever; Tom Wilkinson; Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Effect of Interventional Program on the Utilization of PACS in Point-of-Care Ultrasound.

Authors:  Ross Kessler; Jeffrey R Stowell; Jody A Vogel; Michael M Liao; John L Kendall
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Increasing rate of detection of wrong-patient radiographs: use of photographs obtained at time of radiography.

Authors:  Srini Tridandapani; Senthil Ramamurthy; Samuel J Galgano; James M Provenzale
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Digital DICOM in Dentistry.

Authors:  Jeff Burgess
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-07-31

9.  Proper Management of the Clinical Exposure Index Based on Body Thickness Using Dose Optimization Tools in Digital Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study.

Authors:  Yongsu Yoon; Hyemin Park; Jungmin Kim; Jungsu Kim; Younghoon Roh; Nobukazu Tanaka; Junji Morishita
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Data Standards in Tele-radiology.

Authors:  Mansoor Fatehi; Reza Safdari; Marjan Ghazisaeidi; Mohamad Jebraeily; Mahdi Habibi-Koolaee
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2015-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.