Literature DB >> 28744583

DICOM Standard Conformance in Veterinary Medicine in Germany: a Survey of Imaging Studies in Referral Cases.

Andreas Brühschwein1, Julius Klever2, Tom Wilkinson3, Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg2.   

Abstract

In 2016, the recommendations of the DICOM Standards Committee for the use of veterinary identification DICOM tags had its 10th anniversary. The goal of our study was to survey veterinary DICOM standard conformance in Germany regarding the specific identification tags veterinarians should use in veterinary diagnostic imaging. We hypothesized that most veterinarians in Germany do not follow the guidelines of the DICOM Standards Committee. We analyzed the metadata of 488 imaging studies of referral cases from 115 different veterinary institutions in Germany by computer-aided DICOM header readout. We found that 25 (5.1%) of the imaging studies fully complied with the "veterinary DICOM standard" in this survey. The results confirmed our hypothesis that the recommendations of the DICOM Standards Committee for the consistent and advantageous use of veterinary identification tags have found minimal acceptance amongst German veterinarians. DICOM does not only enable connectivity between machines, DICOM also improves communication between veterinarians by sharing correct and valuable metadata for better patient care. Therefore, we recommend that lecturers, universities, societies, authorities, vendors, and other stakeholders should increase their effort to improve the spread of the veterinary DICOM standard in the veterinary world.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DICOM header; Metadata; Veterinarian; Veterinary DICOM tags

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28744583      PMCID: PMC5788831          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-9998-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  21 in total

1.  DICOM modality worklist: an essential component in a PACS environment.

Authors:  M E Gale; D R Gale
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Minimizing Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Modality Worklist patient/study selection errors.

Authors:  P M Kuzmak; R E Dayhoff
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Introduction to the ACR-NEMA DICOM standard.

Authors:  W D Bidgood; S C Horii
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Incorporating out-patient data from CD-R into the local PACS using DICOM worklist features.

Authors:  P M A van Ooijen; J Guignot; G Mevel; M Oudkerk
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Introduction to DICOM for the practicing veterinarian.

Authors:  Matthew A Wright; Dennis Ballance; Ian D Robertson; Brian Poteet
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.363

Review 6.  The network and its role in digital imaging and communications in medicine imaging.

Authors:  Dennis Ballance
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.363

7.  Assessment of low-cost teleradiology for grading elbow dysplasia.

Authors:  Gawain Hammond; Toby Gemmill; Dominic Mellor; Martin Sullivan
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.363

8.  DICOM Metadata repository for technical information in digital medical images.

Authors:  Hans-Erik Källman; Erik Halsius; Magnus Olsson; Mats Stenström
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 9.  Image dissemination and archiving.

Authors:  Ian Robertson
Journal:  Clin Tech Small Anim Pract       Date:  2007-08

10.  Automated detection of changes in patient exposure in digital projection radiography using exposure index from DICOM header metadata.

Authors:  Hans-Erik Källman; Erik Halsius; Mikael Folkesson; Ylva Larsson; Mats Stenström; Magnus Båth
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.