Literature DB >> 11430800

Cross-modal plasticity underpins language recovery after cochlear implantation.

A L Giraud1, C J Price, J M Graham, E Truy, R S Frackowiak.   

Abstract

Postlingually deaf subjects learn the meaning of sounds after cochlear implantation by forming new associations between sounds and their sources. Implants generate coarse frequency responses, preventing place-coding fine enough to discriminate sounds with similar temporal characteristics, e.g., buck/duck. This limitation imposes a dependency on visual cues, e.g., lipreading. We hypothesized that cross-modal facilitation results from engagement of the visual cortex by purely auditory tasks. In four functional neuroimaging experiments, we show recruitment of early visual cortex (V1/V2) when cochlear implant users listen to sounds with eyes closed. Activity in visual cortex evolved in a stimulus-specific manner as a function of time from implantation reflecting experience-dependent adaptations in the postimplant phase.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11430800     DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00318-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  46 in total

1.  Adaptive changes in early and late blind: a FMRI study of verb generation to heard nouns.

Authors:  H Burton; A Z Snyder; J B Diamond; M E Raichle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex.

Authors:  Arnaud Falchier; Simon Clavagnier; Pascal Barone; Henry Kennedy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Absence of cross-modal reorganization in the primary auditory cortex of congenitally deaf cats.

Authors:  A Kral; J-H Schröder; R Klinke; A K Engel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Long-distance feedback projections to area V1: implications for multisensory integration, spatial awareness, and visual consciousness.

Authors:  Simon Clavagnier; Arnaud Falchier; Henry Kennedy
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; Carolyn McGettigan; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Cued speech for enhancing speech perception and first language development of children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jacqueline Leybaert; Carol J LaSasso
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

7.  Early unilateral cochlear implantation promotes mature cortical asymmetries in adolescents who are deaf.

Authors:  Salima Jiwani; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators.

Authors:  J Rouger; S Lagleyre; B Fraysse; S Deneve; O Deguine; P Barone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The process of spoken word recognition in the face of signal degradation.

Authors:  Ashley Farris-Trimble; Bob McMurray; Nicole Cigrand; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.