Literature DB >> 11429227

Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation: long-term outcome and prognostic significance of patient age and margin status.

L J Solin1, A Fourquet, F A Vicini, B Haffty, M Taylor, B McCormick, M McNeese, L J Pierce, C Landmann, I A Olivotto, J Borger, J Kim, A de la Rochefordiere, D J Schultz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine the long-term outcome for women with mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; intraductal carcinoma) of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by definitive breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An analysis was performed of 422 mammographically detected intraductal breast carcinomas in 418 women from 11 institutions in North America and Europe. All patients were treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by definitive breast irradiation. The median follow-up time was 9.4 years (mean, 9.4 years; range, 0.1-19.8 years).
RESULTS: The 15-year overall survival rate was 92%, and the 15-year cause-specific survival rate was 98%. The 15-year rate of freedom from distant metastases was 94%. There were 48 local failures in the treated breast, and the 15-year rate of any local failure was 16%. The median time to local failure was 5.0 years (mean, 5.7 years; range, 1.0-15.2 years). Patient age at the time of treatment and final pathology margin status from the primary tumor excision were both significantly associated with local failure. The 10-year rate of local failure was 31% for patient age < or = 39 years, 13% for age 40-49 years, 8% for age 50-59 years, and 6% for age > or = 60 years (p = 0.0001). The 10-year rate of local failure was 24% when the margins of resection were positive, 9% when the margins of resection were negative, 7% when the margins of resection were close, and 12% when the margins of resection were unknown (p = 0.030). Patient age < or = 39 years and positive margins of resection were both independently associated with an increased risk of local failure (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.023, respectively) in the multivariable Cox regression model.
CONCLUSIONS: The 15-year results from the present study demonstrated high rates of overall survival, cause-specific survival, and freedom from distant metastases following the treatment of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation. Younger age and positive margins of resection were both independently associated with an increased risk of local failure. The 15-year results in the present study serve as an important benchmark for comparison with other treatment modalities. These results support the use of breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation for the treatment of appropriately selected patients with mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11429227     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01517-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  18 in total

1.  Young age is not associated with increased local recurrence for DCIS treated by breast-conserving surgery and radiation.

Authors:  Aruna Turaka; Gary M Freedman; Tianyu Li; Penny R Anderson; Ramona Swaby; Nicos Nicolaou; Lori Goldstein; Elin R Sigurdson; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Network meta-analysis of margin threshold for women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Haitao Chu; Tatyana Shamliyan; Hawre Jalal; Karen M Kuntz; Robert L Kane; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Biology, treatment, and outcome in very young and older women with DCIS.

Authors:  Rosalinda Alvarado; Sara A Lari; Robert E Roses; Benjamin D Smith; Wei Yang; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Banu K Arun; Anthony Lucci; Gildy V Babiera; Jamie L Wagner; Abigail S Caudle; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Rosa F Hwang; Isabelle Bedrosian; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  ASO Author Reflections: Re-Excision for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Who Is at Risk?

Authors:  Leslie R Lamb; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Annette M Molinaro; Mona L Gauthier; Hal K Berman; Fred Waldman; James Bennington; Henry Sanchez; Cynthia Jimenez; Kim Stewart; Karen Chew; Britt-Marie Ljung; Thea D Tlsty
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Is DCIS breast cancer, and how do I treat it?

Authors:  N Bijker; M Donker; J Wesseling; G J den Heeten; E J Th Rutgers
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-03

7.  Predictors of Reexcision following Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Leslie R Lamb; Sarah Mercaldo; Tawakalitu O Oseni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Comparison of mammography and ultrasound in detecting residual disease following bioptic lumpectomy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Xiufeng Wu; Qingzhong Lin; Jianping Lu; Gang Chen; Y I Zeng; Yinglan Lin; Ying Chen; Yaoqin Wang; Jun Yan
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-14

9.  Mammographic density and breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Laurel A Habel; James J Dignam; Stephanie R Land; Martine Salane; Angela M Capra; Thomas B Julian
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  PI-3 kinase activity is necessary for ERK1/2-induced disruption of mammary epithelial architecture.

Authors:  Gray W Pearson; Tony Hunter
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.