BACKGROUND: Negative margins are associated with reduced risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, there is no consensus about the best minimum margin width. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database for studies of DCIS published in English between January 1970 and July 2010 and examined the relationship between IBTR and margin status after BCS for DCIS. Women with DCIS were stratified into two groups, BCS with or without radiotherapy. We used frequentist and Bayesian approaches to estimate the odds ratios (OR) of IBTR for groups with negative margins and positive margins. We further examined specific margin thresholds using mixed treatment comparisons and meta-regression techniques. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We identified 21 studies published in 24 articles. A total of 1066 IBTR events occurred in 7564 patients, including BCS alone (565 IBTR events in 3098 patients) and BCS with radiotherapy (501 IBTR events in 4466 patients). Compared with positive margins, negative margins were associated with reduced risk of IBTR in patients with radiotherapy (OR = 0.46, 95% credible interval [CrI] = 0.35 to 0.59), and in patients without radiotherapy (OR = 0.34, 95% CrI = 0.24 to 0.47). Compared with patients with positive margins, the risk of IBTR for patients with negative margins was smaller (negative margin >0 mm, OR = 0.45, 95% CrI = 0.38 to 0.53; >2 mm, OR = 0.38, 95% CrI = 0.28 to 0.51; >5 mm, OR = 0.55, 95% CrI = 0.15 to 1.30; and >10 mm, OR = 0.17, 95% CrI = 0.12 to 0.24). Compared with a negative margin greater than 2 mm, a negative margin of at least 10 mm was associated with a lower risk of IBTR (OR = 0.46, 95% CrI = 0.29 to 0.69). We found a probability of .96 that a negative margin threshold greater than 10 mm is the best option compared with other margin thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Negative surgical margins should be obtained for DCIS patients after BCS regardless of radiotherapy. Within cosmetic constraint, surgeons should attempt to achieve negative margins as wide as possible in their first attempt. More studies are needed to understand whether margin thresholds greater than 10 mm are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Negative margins are associated with reduced risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, there is no consensus about the best minimum margin width. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database for studies of DCIS published in English between January 1970 and July 2010 and examined the relationship between IBTR and margin status after BCS for DCIS. Women with DCIS were stratified into two groups, BCS with or without radiotherapy. We used frequentist and Bayesian approaches to estimate the odds ratios (OR) of IBTR for groups with negative margins and positive margins. We further examined specific margin thresholds using mixed treatment comparisons and meta-regression techniques. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We identified 21 studies published in 24 articles. A total of 1066 IBTR events occurred in 7564 patients, including BCS alone (565 IBTR events in 3098 patients) and BCS with radiotherapy (501 IBTR events in 4466 patients). Compared with positive margins, negative margins were associated with reduced risk of IBTR in patients with radiotherapy (OR = 0.46, 95% credible interval [CrI] = 0.35 to 0.59), and in patients without radiotherapy (OR = 0.34, 95% CrI = 0.24 to 0.47). Compared with patients with positive margins, the risk of IBTR for patients with negative margins was smaller (negative margin >0 mm, OR = 0.45, 95% CrI = 0.38 to 0.53; >2 mm, OR = 0.38, 95% CrI = 0.28 to 0.51; >5 mm, OR = 0.55, 95% CrI = 0.15 to 1.30; and >10 mm, OR = 0.17, 95% CrI = 0.12 to 0.24). Compared with a negative margin greater than 2 mm, a negative margin of at least 10 mm was associated with a lower risk of IBTR (OR = 0.46, 95% CrI = 0.29 to 0.69). We found a probability of .96 that a negative margin threshold greater than 10 mm is the best option compared with other margin thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Negative surgical margins should be obtained for DCIS patients after BCS regardless of radiotherapy. Within cosmetic constraint, surgeons should attempt to achieve negative margins as wide as possible in their first attempt. More studies are needed to understand whether margin thresholds greater than 10 mm are warranted.
Authors: Heather R MacDonald; Melvin J Silverstein; Helen Mabry; Brenda Moorthy; Wei Ye; Melinda S Epstein; Dennis Holmes; Howard Silberman; Michael Lagios Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: E B Fish; J A Chapman; N A Miller; M A Link; E Fishell; B Wright; D R McCready; G Y Hiraki; T M Ross; W M Hanna; H L Lickley Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: A M Glenny; D G Altman; F Song; C Sakarovitch; J J Deeks; R D'Amico; M Bradburn; A J Eastwood Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Lawrence J Solin; Alain Fourquet; Frank A Vicini; Marie Taylor; Ivo A Olivotto; Bruce Haffty; Eric A Strom; Lori J Pierce; Lawrence B Marks; Harry Bartelink; Marsha D McNeese; Anuja Jhingran; Elaine Wai; Nina Bijker; Francois Campana; Wei-Ting Hwang Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Julia S Wong; Carolyn M Kaelin; Susan L Troyan; Michele A Gadd; Rebecca Gelman; Susan C Lester; Stuart J Schnitt; Dennis C Sgroi; Barbara J Silver; Jay R Harris; Barbara L Smith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M T van Mackelenbergh; C M Lindner; T Heilmann; I Alkatout; M Elessawy; C Mundhenke; N Maass; C Schem Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Audree B Tadros; Benjamin D Smith; Yu Shen; Heather Lin; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Anthony Lucci; Carlos H Barcenas; Rosa F Hwang; Gaiane Rauch; Lumarie Santiago; Eric A Strom; Sarah M DeSnyder; Wei T Yang; Dalliah M Black; Constance T Albarracin; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jing Zhang; Bradley P Carlin; James D Neaton; Guoxing G Soon; Lei Nie; Robert Kane; Beth A Virnig; Haitao Chu Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: M Luke Marinovich; Lamiae Azizi; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Monica Morrow; Lawrence J Solin; Nehmat Houssami Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Devon Livingston-Rosanoff; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Polly A Newcomb; Lee G Wilke Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 4.872