Literature DB >> 23239193

Is DCIS breast cancer, and how do I treat it?

N Bijker1, M Donker, J Wesseling, G J den Heeten, E J Th Rutgers.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a pre-invasive stage of breast cancer with a heterogeneous clinical behaviour. Since the introduction of mammographic screening programmes, the incidence of DCIS has shown a dramatic increase. Treatment should focus on the prevention of progression to invasive disease. If progression occurs, poorly differentiated DCIS frequently gives rise to grade III invasive breast cancer, whereas well differentiated DCIS more often recurs as grade I invasive disease. However, at present, validated diagnostic test are lacking to predict progression accurately. The majority of women with DCIS are suitable for breast conserving therapy. Obtaining clear surgical margins is the most important goal of a local excision. Radiotherapy is effective in reducing the risk of local recurrence with about 50 % in all subgroups of patients with DCIS. (Breast cancer specific) survival of women with DCIS is excellent, and radiotherapy does not further improve this. Future research should be directed in enabling to select women who have a high risk of--invasive--recurrence, so in which radiotherapy should be standard part of the breast conserving approach, and those women with a more indolent lesion, in which after surgery a watchful waiting approach can be followed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23239193     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-012-0217-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  73 in total

1.  Microcalcifications of the breast: how does radiologic classification correlate with histology?

Authors:  M Müller-Schimpfle; A Wersebe; T Xydeas; A Fischmann; U Vogel; N Fersis; C D Claussen; K Siegmann
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Neu-protein overexpression in breast cancer. Association with comedo-type ductal carcinoma in situ and limited prognostic value in stage II breast cancer.

Authors:  M J van de Vijver; J L Peterse; W J Mooi; P Wisman; J Lomans; O Dalesio; R Nusse
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-11-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Variation between hospitals in surgical margins after first breast-conserving surgery in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo; Linda de Munck; Otto Visser; Pieter J Westenend; Thijs van Dalen; Marian B Menke; Emiel J Rutgers; Petra H Peeters
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Boost radiotherapy in young women with ductal carcinoma in situ: a multicentre, retrospective study of the Rare Cancer Network.

Authors:  Aurelius Omlin; Maurizio Amichetti; David Azria; Bernard F Cole; Philippe Fourneret; Philip Poortmans; Diana Naehrig; Robert C Miller; Marco Krengli; Cristina Gutierrez Miguelez; David Morgan; Hadassah Goldberg; Luciano Scandolaro; Pauline Gastelblum; Mahmut Ozsahin; Dagmar Dohr; David Christie; Ulrich Oppitz; Ufuk Abacioglu; Guenther Gruber
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Ten-year results comparing mastectomy to excision and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  M J Silverstein; A Barth; D N Poller; E D Gierson; W J Colburn; J R Waisman; P Gamagami
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Long-term follow-up of in situ carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  V Eusebi; E Feudale; M P Foschini; A Micheli; A Conti; C Riva; S Di Palma; F Rilke
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 7.  The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies.

Authors:  Mireille Broeders; Sue Moss; Lennarth Nyström; Sisse Njor; Håkan Jonsson; Ellen Paap; Nathalie Massat; Stephen Duffy; Elsebeth Lynge; Eugenio Paci
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Adriana M J Bluekens; Roland Holland; Nico Karssemeijer; Mireille J M Broeders; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes.

Authors:  Beth A Virnig; Todd M Tuttle; Tatyana Shamliyan; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Immunohistochemical categorisation of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  P Meijnen; J L Peterse; N Antonini; E J Th Rutgers; M J van de Vijver
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  17 in total

1.  Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.

Authors:  Geunwon Kim; Peter G Mikhael; Tawakalitu O Oseni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Immunostaining of ∆Np63 (using the p40 antibody) is equal to that of p63 and CK5/6 in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Verena Sailer; Christine Lüders; Walther Kuhn; Volker Pelzer; Glen Kristiansen
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Genome-wide identification and analysis of prognostic features in human cancers.

Authors:  Joan C Smith; Jason M Sheltzer
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 9.995

4.  Histopathological characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast according to HER2 amplification status and molecular subtype.

Authors:  Mieke Van Bockstal; Kathleen Lambein; Hannelore Denys; Geert Braems; Ann Nuyts; Rudy Van den Broecke; Veronique Cocquyt; Olivier De Wever; Louis Libbrecht
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Prognostic Score-Based Stratification Analysis Reveals Universal Benefits of Radiotherapy on Lowering the Risk of Ipsilateral Breast Event for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients with Different Risk Levels.

Authors:  Libo Yang; Dongli Lu; Yutian Lai; Mengjia Shen; Qiuxiao Yu; Ting Lei; Tianjie Pu; Hong Bu
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Everolimus Inhibits the Progression of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Breast Cancer Via Downregulation of MMP9 Expression.

Authors:  Guang Chen; Xiao-Fei Ding; Kyle Pressley; Hakim Bouamar; Bingzhi Wang; Guixi Zheng; Larry E Broome; Alia Nazarullah; Andrew J Brenner; Virginia Kaklamani; Ismail Jatoi; Lu-Zhe Sun
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Correlating Tumor Stiffness with Immunohistochemical Subtypes of Breast Cancers: Prognostic Value of Comb-Push Ultrasound Shear Elastography for Differentiating Luminal Subtypes.

Authors:  Max Denis; Adriana Gregory; Mahdi Bayat; Robert T Fazzio; Dana H Whaley; Karthik Ghosh; Sejal Shah; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The importance of early detection of calcifications associated with breast cancer in screening.

Authors:  J J Mordang; A Gubern-Mérida; A Bria; F Tortorella; R M Mann; M J M Broeders; G J den Heeten; N Karssemeijer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Systematic identification of mutations and copy number alterations associated with cancer patient prognosis.

Authors:  Joan C Smith; Jason M Sheltzer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy in Ductal Carcinoma in situ: Residual Microcalcifications and Intraoperative Findings.

Authors:  Benedict Krischer; Serafino Forte; Gad Singer; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Cornelia Leo
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.