Literature DB >> 25329078

Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.

Melvin J Yap1, Daragh E Sibley2, David A Balota3, Roger Ratcliff4, Jay Rueckl5.   

Abstract

Researchers have extensively documented how various statistical properties of words (e.g., word frequency) influence lexical processing. However, the impact of lexical variables on nonword decision-making performance is less clear. This gap is surprising, because a better specification of the mechanisms driving nonword responses may provide valuable insights into early lexical processes. In the present study, item-level and participant-level analyses were conducted on the trial-level lexical decision data for almost 37,000 nonwords in the English Lexicon Project in order to identify the influence of different psycholinguistic variables on nonword lexical decision performance and to explore individual differences in how participants respond to nonwords. Item-level regression analyses reveal that nonword response time was positively correlated with number of letters, number of orthographic neighbors, number of affixes, and base-word number of syllables, and negatively correlated with Levenshtein orthographic distance and base-word frequency. Participant-level analyses also point to within- and between-session stability in nonword responses across distinct sets of items, and intriguingly reveal that higher vocabulary knowledge is associated with less sensitivity to some dimensions (e.g., number of letters) but more sensitivity to others (e.g., base-word frequency). The present findings provide well-specified and interesting new constraints for informing models of word recognition and lexical decision. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25329078      PMCID: PMC4404174          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  47 in total

1.  Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: still a challenge for current word recognition models.

Authors:  J C Ziegler; A M Jacobs; D Klüppel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

3.  Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming.

Authors:  Ludovic Ferrand; Boris New
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2003-06

4.  Wuggy: a multilingual pseudoword generator.

Authors:  Emmanuel Keuleers; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-08

5.  A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms.

Authors:  J A Horne; O Ostberg
Journal:  Int J Chronobiol       Date:  1976

6.  Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  Boris New; Ludovic Ferrand; Christophe Pallier; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

7.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence.

Authors:  Florian Schmiedek; Klaus Oberauer; Oliver Wilhelm; Heinz-Martin Süss; Werner W Wittmann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

8.  Putting it all together: a unified account of word recognition and reaction-time distributions.

Authors:  Dennis Norris
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

10.  The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.

Authors:  Emmanuel Keuleers; Paula Lacey; Kathleen Rastle; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-03
View more
  16 in total

1.  Contribution of writing to reading: Dissociation between cognitive and motor process in the left dorsal premotor cortex.

Authors:  Chotiga Pattamadilok; Aurélie Ponz; Samuel Planton; Mireille Bonnard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  A diffusion decision model analysis of evidence variability in the lexical decision task.

Authors:  Gabriel Tillman; Adam F Osth; Don van Ravenzwaaij; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  Modulation of additive and interactive effects by trial history revisited.

Authors:  Michael E J Masson; Maximilian M Rabe; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

4.  A compositional neural code in high-level visual cortex can explain jumbled word reading.

Authors:  Aakash Agrawal; Kvs Hari; S P Arun
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Retest reliability of the parameters of the Ratcliff diffusion model.

Authors:  Veronika Lerche; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-04-23

6.  The neural correlates of morphological complexity processing: Detecting structure in pseudowords.

Authors:  Swetlana Schuster; Mathias Scharinger; Colin Brooks; Aditi Lahiri; Gesa Hartwigsen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Experimental validation of the diffusion model based on a slow response time paradigm.

Authors:  Veronika Lerche; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-09

8.  Age differences in diffusion model parameters: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maximilian Theisen; Veronika Lerche; Mischa von Krause; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-13

9.  Case mixing impedes early lexical access: converging evidence from the masked priming paradigm.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Philip A Allen; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-04

10.  Novel reading index for identifying disordered reading skill development: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Brianne Mohl; Noa Ofen; Lara L Jones; Joseph E Casey; Jeffrey A Stanley
Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol Child       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.