Literature DB >> 11414131

Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields.

C S Royden1, J M Wolfe, N Klempen.   

Abstract

In visual search, items defined by a unique feature are found easily and efficiently. Search for a moving target among stationary distractors is one such efficient search. Search for a stationary target among moving distractors is markedly more difficult. In the experiments reported here, we confirm this finding and further show that searches for a stationary target within a structured flow field are more efficient than searches for stationary targets among distractors moving in random directions. The structured motion fields tested included uniform direction of motion, a radial flow field simulating observer forward motion, and a deformation flow field inconsistent with observer motion. The results using optic flow stimuli were not significantly different from the results obtained with other structured fields of distractors. The results suggest that the local properties of the flow fields rather than global optic flow properties are important for determining the efficiency of search for a stationary target.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11414131     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  10 in total

1.  Humans perceive object motion in world coordinates during obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; Melissa S Parade; Jonathan S Matthis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Modelling Visual Search with the Selective Attention for Identification Model (VS-SAIM): A Novel Explanation for Visual Search Asymmetries.

Authors:  Dietmar Heinke; Andreas Backhaus
Journal:  Cognit Comput       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 5.418

3.  Does optic flow parsing depend on prior estimation of heading?

Authors:  Paul A Warren; Simon K Rushton; Andrew J Foulkes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Coarse guidance by numerosity in visual search.

Authors:  Ester Reijnen; Jeremy M Wolfe; Joseph Krummenacher
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Is apparent instability a guiding feature in visual search?

Authors:  Yung-Hao Yang; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-06-16

6.  Acoustic facilitation of object movement detection during self-motion.

Authors:  F J Calabro; S Soto-Faraco; L M Vaina
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Haptic pop-out of movable stimuli.

Authors:  Vonne van Polanen; Wouter M Bergmann Tiest; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Tracking multiple fish.

Authors:  Filip Děchtěrenko; Daniela Jakubková; Jiří Lukavský; Christina J Howard
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  The Roles of Non-retinotopic Motions in Visual Search.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Isamu Motoyoshi; Takao Sato
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-01

10.  Accuracy and Tuning of Flow Parsing for Visual Perception of Object Motion During Self-Motion.

Authors:  Diederick C Niehorster; Li Li
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-05-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.