Literature DB >> 21475687

Modelling Visual Search with the Selective Attention for Identification Model (VS-SAIM): A Novel Explanation for Visual Search Asymmetries.

Dietmar Heinke, Andreas Backhaus.   

Abstract

In earlier work, we developed the Selective Attention for Identification Model (SAIM [16]). SAIM models the human ability to perform translation-invariant object identification in multiple object scenes. SAIM suggests that central for this ability is an interaction between parallel competitive processes in a selection stage and a object identification stage. In this paper, we applied the model to visual search experiments involving simple lines and letters. We presented successful simulation results for asymmetric and symmetric searches and for the influence of background line orientations. Search asymmetry refers to changes in search performance when the roles of target item and non-target item (distractor) are swapped. In line with other models of visual search, the results suggest that a large part of the empirical evidence can be explained by competitive processes in the brain, which are modulated by the similarity between target and distractor. The simulations also suggest that another important factor is the feature properties of distractors. Finally, the simulations indicate that search asymmetries can be the outcome of interactions between top-down (knowledge about search items) and bottom-up (feature of search items) processing. This interaction in VS-SAIM is dominated by a novel mechanism, the knowledge-based on-centre-off-surround receptive field. This receptive field is reminiscent of the classical receptive fields but the exact shape is modulated by both, top-down and bottom-up processes. The paper discusses supporting evidence for the existence of this novel concept.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21475687      PMCID: PMC3059816          DOI: 10.1007/s12559-010-9076-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognit Comput        ISSN: 1866-9956            Impact factor:   5.418


  25 in total

1.  Lateral inhibition in the inner retina is important for spatial tuning of ganglion cells.

Authors:  P B Cook; J S McReynolds
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields.

Authors:  C S Royden; J M Wolfe; N Klempen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

3.  The effect of familiarity on visual-search performance: evidence for learned basic features.

Authors:  P Malinowski; R Hübner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

4.  Asymmetries in visual search: an introduction.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

5.  Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds.

Authors:  J R Mounts
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-07

Review 6.  The neural basis of object perception.

Authors:  Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 7.  The ON and OFF channels of the visual system.

Authors:  P H Schiller
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution.

Authors:  Notger G Müller; Maas Mollenhauer; Alexander Rösler; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?

Authors:  M M Chun; J M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Parallel and serial processes in motion detection.

Authors:  M Dick; S Ullman; D Sagi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-07-24       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  Visual Search Asymmetry: Deep Nets and Humans Share Similar Inherent Biases.

Authors:  Shashi Kant Gupta; Mengmi Zhang; Chia-Chien Wu; Jeremy M Wolfe; Gabriel Kreiman
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2021-12

2.  A robotics-based approach to modeling of choice reaching experiments on visual attention.

Authors:  Soeren Strauss; Dietmar Heinke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-17

3.  The timing of vision - how neural processing links to different temporal dynamics.

Authors:  Timothée Masquelier; Larissa Albantakis; Gustavo Deco
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-30

4.  The Emergence of Selective Attention through Probabilistic Associations between Stimuli and Actions.

Authors:  Luca Simione; Stefano Nolfi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Excitatory versus inhibitory feedback in Bayesian formulations of scene construction.

Authors:  Alireza Khatoon Abadi; Keyvan Yahya; Massoud Amini; Karl Friston; Dietmar Heinke
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Search performance is better predicted by tileability than presence of a unique basic feature.

Authors:  Honghua Chang; Ruth Rosenholtz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Choice reaching with a LEGO arm robot (CoRLEGO): The motor system guides visual attention to movement-relevant information.

Authors:  Soeren Strauss; Philip J W Woodgate; Saber A Sami; Dietmar Heinke
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2015-11-04

8.  Scene memory and spatial inhibition in visual search : A neural dynamic process model and new experimental evidence.

Authors:  Raul Grieben; Jan Tekülve; Stephan K U Zibner; Jonas Lins; Sebastian Schneegans; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.