Literature DB >> 33100884

Is apparent instability a guiding feature in visual search?

Yung-Hao Yang1,2, Jeremy M Wolfe1.   

Abstract

Humans are quick to notice if an object is unstable. Does that assessment require attention or can instability serve as a preattentive feature that can guide the deployment of attention? This paper describes a series of visual search experiments, designed to address this question. Experiment 1 shows that less stable images among more stable images are found more efficiently than more stable among less stable; a search asymmetry that supports guidance by instability. Experiment 2 shows efficient search but no search asymmetry when the orientation of the objects is removed as a confound. Experiment 3 independently varies the orientation cues and perceived stability and finds a clear main effect of apparent stability. Experiment 4 shows converging evidence for a role of stability using different stimuli that lack an orientation cue. However, here both search for stable and unstable targets is inefficient. Experiment 5 is a control for Experiment 4, showing that the stability effect in Experiment 4 is not simple side-effects of the geometry of the stimuli. On balance, the data support a role for instability in the guidance of attention in visual search. (184 words).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Instability; Preattentive feature; Search asymmetry; Visual search; feature search; gravity

Year:  2020        PMID: 33100884      PMCID: PMC7577071          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1779892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  36 in total

1.  Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields.

Authors:  C S Royden; J M Wolfe; N Klempen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

2.  Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries?

Authors:  R Rosenholtz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

3.  Asymmetries in visual search: an introduction.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

4.  Which end is up? Two representations of orientation in visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; N L Klempen; E P Shulman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Feature asymmetries in visual search: effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency.

Authors:  M Carrasco; T L McLean; S M Katz; K S Frieder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.

Authors:  A Treisman; J Souther
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1985-09

7.  Gravity and the tilt aftereffect.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; R Held
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Evan M Palmer; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Forms of momentum across space: representational, operational, and attentional.

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

10.  Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015).

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-05-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  Invariant representation of physical stability in the human brain.

Authors:  R T Pramod; Michael A Cohen; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Similarity and Dissimilarity in Perceptual Organization: On the Complexity of the Gestalt Principle of Similarity.

Authors:  Baingio Pinna; Daniele Porcheddu; Jurgis Skilters
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.