Literature DB >> 11404330

Regions of lower crossing over harbor more rare variants in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

P Andolfatto1, M Przeworski.   

Abstract

A correlation between diversity levels and rates of recombination is predicted both by models of positive selection, such as hitchhiking associated with the rapid fixation of advantageous mutations, and by models of purifying selection against strongly deleterious mutations (commonly referred to as "background selection"). With parameter values appropriate for Drosophila populations, only the first class of models predicts a marked skew in the frequency spectrum of linked neutral variants, relative to a neutral model. Here, we consider 29 loci scattered throughout the Drosophila melanogaster genome. We show that, in African populations, a summary of the frequency spectrum of polymorphic mutations is positively correlated with the meiotic rate of crossing over. This pattern is demonstrated to be unlikely under a model of background selection. Models of weakly deleterious selection are not expected to produce both the observed correlation and the extent to which nucleotide diversity is reduced in regions of low (but nonzero) recombination. Thus, of existing models, hitchhiking due to the recurrent fixation of advantageous variants is the most plausible explanation for the data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11404330      PMCID: PMC1461661     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  58 in total

Review 1.  Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  DNA polymorphism in a subdivided population: the expected number of segregating sites in the two-subpopulation model.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection.

Authors:  A J Berry; J W Ajioka; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  On the effective size of populations with separate sexes, with particular reference to sex-linked genes.

Authors:  A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution.

Authors:  R L Cann; M Stoneking; A C Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jan 1-7       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  55 in total

1.  The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci.

Authors:  Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a multi-locus approach.

Authors:  Sascha Glinka; Lino Ometto; Sylvain Mousset; Wolfgang Stephan; David De Lorenzo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans.

Authors:  Ines Hellmann; Ingo Ebersberger; Susan E Ptak; Svante Pääbo; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Distinguishing the hitchhiking and background selection models.

Authors:  Hideki Innan; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Identification of a locus under complex positive selection in Drosophila simulans by haplotype mapping and composite-likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Colin D Meiklejohn; Yuseob Kim; Daniel L Hartl; John Parsch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Patterns of neutral diversity under general models of selective sweeps.

Authors:  Graham Coop; Peter Ralph
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  A pseudohitchhiking model of X vs. autosomal diversity.

Authors:  Andrea J Betancourt; Yuseob Kim; H Allen Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall; Peter Andolfatto; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.