Literature DB >> 11394487

Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.

J Landon1, M Davison.   

Abstract

Six pigeons were trained in sessions that consisted of six or seven concurrent-schedule components, each of which could have a different reinforcer ratio arranged in it. The components were unsignaled and occurred in a random order separated by 10-s blackouts. The overall reinforcer rate arranged in each component was 2.22 reinforcers per minute. In Experiment 1, the range of reinforcer ratios in the seven components was varied from a condition in which the ratios were always 1:1, to a condition in which the ratios varied between concurrent variable-interval 27 s extinction (EXT) and concurrent extinction variable-interval 27 s (ratios of 1:EXT, 9:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, 1:9, EXT:1). In Experiment 2, the range of reinforcer ratios was always 27:1 to 1:27, and the presence and absence of the intermediate reinforcer ratios used in Experiment 1 (9:1, 3:1, 1:1, 1:3, 1:9) were investigated. Log response-allocation ratios in components changed rapidly with increasing numbers of reinforcers in components, and Experiment 1 showed that sensitivity to reinforcement was usually higher when the range of reinforcer ratios was greater. When the range of reinforcer ratios was kept constant in Experiment 2, the presence or absence of less extreme reinforcer ratios had no clear effect on sensitivity. At a local level, individual reinforcers had predictable quantitative effects on response ratios: Successive same-alternative reinforcers in a component had rapidly diminishing effects in both experiments. Reinforcers obtained on the opposite alternative to one or more prior reinforcers always had large effects on preference, and these changes were greater when the range of reinforcer ratios was greater. The effects of such reinforcers in changing preference were enhanced, and produced clear preference reversals, when intermediate reinforcer ratios were absent in Experiment 2. Two processes, one local to reinforcers and one with a longer time course, may be necessary to account for these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11394487      PMCID: PMC1284815          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  How pigeons estimate rates of prey encounter.

Authors:  S J Shettleworth; C M Plowright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1992-07

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Residence time and choice in concurrent foraging schedules.

Authors:  B M Jones; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate.

Authors:  B Alsop; D Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A mathematical model for simple learning.

Authors:  R R BUSH; F MOSTELLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1951-09       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Effects of rate of reinforcement and rate of change on choice behaviour in transition.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1997-05

10.  Concurrent schedules: undermatching and control by previous experimental conditions.

Authors:  M C Davison; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  18 in total

1.  Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice in a variable environment: effects of unequal reinforcer distributions.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.

Authors:  Michael Davison; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Dynamical concurrent schedules.

Authors:  William L Palya; Robert W Allan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.

Authors:  Christian U Krägeloh; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.

Authors:  Christian U Krägeloh; Michael Davison; Douglas M Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Maternal nutrition and four-alternative choice.

Authors:  Michael Davison; Christian U Krägeloh; Mhoyra Fraser; Bernhard H Breier
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Global undernutrition during gestation influences learning during adult life.

Authors:  Jason Landon; Michael Davison; Christian U Krägeloh; Nichola M Thompson; Jennifer L Miles; Mark H Vickers; Mhoyra Fraser; Bernhard H Breier
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.