Literature DB >> 1619391

How pigeons estimate rates of prey encounter.

S J Shettleworth1, C M Plowright.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on operant schedules simulating successive encounters with prey items. When items were encountered on variable-interval schedules, birds were more likely to accept a poor item (long delay to food) the longer they had just searched, as if they were averaging prey density over a short memory window (Experiment 1). Responding as if the immediate future would be like the immediate past was reversed when a short search predicted a long search next time (Experiment 2). Experience with different degrees of environmental predictability appeared to change the length of the memory window (Experiment 3). The results may reflect linear waiting (Higa, Wynne, & Staddon, 1991), but they differ in some respects. The findings have implications for possible mechanisms of adjusting behavior to current reinforcement conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1619391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  5 in total

1.  Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.

Authors:  J Landon; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent chains.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace; Orn Bragason; Anthony P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Group foraging sensitivity to predictable and unpredictable changes in food distribution: past experience or present circumstances?

Authors:  Kenneth E Bell; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Memory and foraging theory: Chimpanzee utilization of optimality heuristics in the rank-order recovery of hidden foods.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Charles R Menzel
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Basolateral amygdala lesions and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in concurrent chains schedules.

Authors:  Christa M Helms; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.332

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.