Literature DB >> 11393876

Learning a coordination skill: interactive effects of instruction and feedback.

N J Hodges1, I M Franks.   

Abstract

Information prior to and during the acquisition of a continuous bimanual task was manipulated. Participants practiced a difficult coordination pattern, which produced circular shapes on the computer, when they moved their arms correctly. Four groups were examined, which differed in the type and amount of information provided. Either limb or circle feedback was provided in the presence or absence of instructions detailing how to move the limbs. Circle feedback facilitated learning relative to the limb feedback in which the explicit displacements of the limbs was displayed. Under circle feedback conditions, instructions hindered acquisition. Little instructional effects were observed under limb feedback conditions, despite the prediction that instructions would benefit learning when the feedback was more compatible. Findings are discussed in relation to the complexity of the feedback and processing demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11393876     DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2001.10608943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  17 in total

1.  Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Nicola J Hodges; Olav E Krigolson; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Limited acquisition and generalisation of rhotics with ultrasound visual feedback in childhood apraxia.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Edwin Maas; Jessica Whittle; Megan C Leece; Patricia McCabe
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Effects of variable practice and declarative knowledge on sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual feedback.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Observational practice of relative but not absolute motion features in a single-limb multi-joint coordination task.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Young U Ryu; Kirk Zihlman; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Manipulating visual-motor experience to probe for observation-induced after-effects in adaptation learning.

Authors:  Shannon B Lim; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Specificity in practice benefits learning in novice models and variability in demonstration benefits observational practice.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Noah J Dean
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-09-02

7.  Remediating Residual Rhotic Errors With Traditional and Ultrasound-Enhanced Treatment: A Single-Case Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister; Emily Phillips; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Jackie Sihyun Kim; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Acquisition, retention, and generalization of rhotics with and without ultrasound visual feedback.

Authors:  Greta M Sjolie; Megan C Leece; Jonathan L Preston
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Enhancing Intervention for Residual Rhotic Errors Via App-Delivered Biofeedback: A Case Study.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Heather Campbell; Helen Carey; Wendy Liang; Tae Hong Park; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Treatment for Residual Rhotic Errors With High- and Low-Frequency Ultrasound Visual Feedback: A Single-Case Experimental Design.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Tara McAllister; Emily Phillips; Suzanne Boyce; Mark Tiede; Jackie S Kim; Douglas H Whalen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.