Literature DB >> 11353401

Equivalence between Haseman-Elston and variance-components linkage analyses for sib pairs.

P C Sham1, S Purcell.   

Abstract

The Haseman-Elston regression method offers a simpler alternative to variance-components (VC) models, for the linkage analysis of quantitative traits. However, even the "revisited" method, which uses the cross-product--rather than the squared difference--in sib trait values, is, in general, less powerful than VC models. In this report, we clarify the relative efficiencies of existing Haseman-Elston methods and show how a new Haseman-Elston method can be constructed to have power equivalent to that of VC models. This method uses as the dependent variable a linear combination of squared sums and squared differences, in which the weights are determined by the overall trait correlation between sibs in a population. We show how this method can be used for both the selection of maximally informative sib pairs for genotyping and the subsequent analysis of such selected samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11353401      PMCID: PMC1226141          DOI: 10.1086/320593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  8 in total

1.  Haseman and Elston revisited.

Authors:  R C Elston; S Buxbaum; K B Jacobs; J M Olson
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Variance-Components QTL linkage analysis of selected and non-normal samples: conditioning on trait values.

Authors:  P C Sham; J H Zhao; S S Cherny; J K Hewitt
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Optimal sibship selection for genotyping in quantitative trait locus linkage analysis.

Authors:  S Purcell; S S Cherny; J K Hewitt; P C Sham
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.444

4.  Analytic power calculation for QTL linkage analysis of small pedigrees.

Authors:  F V Rijsdijk; J K Hewitt; P C Sham
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits.

Authors:  X Xu; S Weiss; X Xu; L J Wei
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-08-28       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  How sib pairs reveal linkage.

Authors:  E Drigalenko
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  The phenotypic difference discards sib-pair QTL linkage information.

Authors:  F A Wright
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus.

Authors:  J K Haseman; R C Elston
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.805

  8 in total
  34 in total

1.  A score-statistic approach for the mapping of quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size.

Authors:  K Wang; J Huang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-12-27       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Linkage analysis of extremely discordant and concordant sibling pairs identifies quantitative-trait loci that influence variation in the human personality trait neuroticism.

Authors:  Jan Fullerton; Matthew Cubin; Hemant Tiwari; Chenxi Wang; Amarjit Bomhra; Stuart Davidson; Sue Miller; Christopher Fairburn; Guy Goodwin; Michael C Neale; Simon Fiddy; Richard Mott; David B Allison; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Powerful regression-based quantitative-trait linkage analysis of general pedigrees.

Authors:  Pak C Sham; Shaun Purcell; Stacey S Cherny; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Regression-based quantitative-trait-locus mapping in the 21st century.

Authors:  Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Bias toward the null hypothesis in model-free linkage analysis is highly dependent on the test statistic used.

Authors:  Heather J Cordell
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Theoretical and empirical power of regression and maximum-likelihood methods to map quantitative trait loci in general pedigrees.

Authors:  Xijiang Yu; Sara A Knott; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  A powerful and robust new linkage statistic for discordant sibling pairs.

Authors:  Jin P Szatkiewicz; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A powerful and robust method for mapping quantitative trait loci in general pedigrees.

Authors:  G Diao; D Y Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Weighting affected sib pairs by marker informativity.

Authors:  Daniel Franke; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Recent advances in human quantitative-trait-locus mapping: comparison of methods for discordant sibling pairs.

Authors:  Jin P Szatkiewicz; Karen T Cuenco; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.