Literature DB >> 11359064

Optimal sibship selection for genotyping in quantitative trait locus linkage analysis.

S Purcell1, S S Cherny, J K Hewitt, P C Sham.   

Abstract

In this paper we present a novel method for selecting optimally informative sibships of any size for quantitative trait locus (QTL) linkage analysis. The method allocates a quantitative index of potential informativeness to each sibship on the basis of observed trait scores and an assumed true QTL model. Any sample of phenotypically screened sibships can therefore be easily rank-ordered for selective genotyping. The quantitative index is the sibship's expected contribution to the non-centrality parameter. This expectation represents the weighted sum of chi(2) test statistics that would be obtained given the observed trait values over all possible sibship genotypic configurations; each configuration is weighted by the likelihood of it occurring given the assumed true genetic model. The properties of this procedure are explored in relation to the accuracy of the assumed true genetic model and sibship size. In comparison to previous methods of selecting phenotypically extreme sibships for genotyping, the proposed method is considerably more efficient and is robust with regard to the specification of the genetic model. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11359064     DOI: 10.1159/000053350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  8 in total

1.  Equivalence between Haseman-Elston and variance-components linkage analyses for sib pairs.

Authors:  P C Sham; S Purcell
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Powerful regression-based quantitative-trait linkage analysis of general pedigrees.

Authors:  Pak C Sham; Shaun Purcell; Stacey S Cherny; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Recent advances in human quantitative-trait-locus mapping: comparison of methods for discordant sibling pairs.

Authors:  Jin P Szatkiewicz; Karen T Cuenco; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in the post-genomic era.

Authors:  Philip Asherson
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.785

5.  Linkage to chromosome 1p36 for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder traits in school and home settings.

Authors:  Kaixin Zhou; Philip Asherson; Pak Sham; Barbara Franke; Richard J L Anney; Jan Buitelaar; Richard Ebstein; Michael Gill; Keeley Brookes; Cathelijne Buschgens; Desmond Campbell; Wai Chen; Hanna Christiansen; Ellen Fliers; Isabel Gabriëls; Lena Johansson; Rafaela Marco; Fernando Mulas; Ueli Müller; Aisling Mulligan; Benjamin M Neale; Fruhling Rijsdijk; Nanda Rommelse; Henrik Uebel; Lamprini Psychogiou; Xiaohui Xu; Tobias Banaschewski; Edmund Sonuga-Barke; Jacques Eisenberg; Iris Manor; Ana Miranda; Robert D Oades; Herbert Roeyers; Aribert Rothenberger; Joseph Sergeant; Hans-Christoph Steinhausen; Eric Taylor; Margaret Thompson; Stephen V Faraone
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 13.382

6.  Genome-wide linkage analysis of multiple measures of neuroticism of 2 large cohorts from Australia and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Naomi R Wray; Christel M Middeldorp; Andrew J Birley; Scott D Gordon; Patrick F Sullivan; Peter M Visscher; Dale R Nyholt; Gonneke Willemsen; Eco J C de Geus; P Eline Slagboom; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2008-06

7.  Accurate, Large-Scale Genotyping of 5HTTLPR and Flanking Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in an Association Study of Depression, Anxiety, and Personality Measures.

Authors:  Naomi R Wray; Michael R James; Scott D Gordon; Troy Dumenil; Leanne Ryan; William L Coventry; Dixie J Statham; Michele L Pergadia; Pamela A F Madden; Andrew C Heath; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 8.  A survey of current software for genetic power calculations.

Authors:  Jo Knight
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.