Literature DB >> 10961909

A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits.

X Xu1, S Weiss, X Xu1, L J Wei.   

Abstract

The Haseman and Elston (H-E) method uses a simple linear regression to model the squared trait difference of sib pairs with the shared allele identical by descent (IBD) at marker locus for linkage testing. Under this setting, the squared mean-corrected trait sum is also linearly related to the IBD sharing. However, the resulting slope estimate for either model is not efficient. In this report, we propose a simple linkage test that optimally uses information from the estimates of both models. We also demonstrate that the new test is more powerful than both the traditional one and the recently revisited H-E methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10961909      PMCID: PMC1287874          DOI: 10.1086/303081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  6 in total

1.  Haseman and Elston revisited.

Authors:  R C Elston; S Buxbaum; K B Jacobs; J M Olson
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  How sib pairs reveal linkage.

Authors:  E Drigalenko
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Assessing genetic linkage and association with robust components of variance approaches.

Authors:  C I Amos; D K Zhu; E Boerwinkle
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.670

4.  An improved multipoint sib-pair analysis of quantitative traits.

Authors:  D W Fulker; S S Cherny
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  The phenotypic difference discards sib-pair QTL linkage information.

Authors:  F A Wright
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus.

Authors:  J K Haseman; R C Elston
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.805

  6 in total
  26 in total

1.  Transformation of sib-pair values for the Haseman-Elston method.

Authors:  D Wang; S Lin; R Cheng; X Gao; F A Wright
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  A score-statistic approach for the mapping of quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size.

Authors:  K Wang; J Huang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-12-27       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Quantitative trait loci on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 18 control variation in levels of T and B lymphocyte subpopulations.

Authors:  M A Hall; P J Norman; B Thiel; H Tiwari; A Peiffer; R W Vaughan; S Prescott; M Leppert; N J Schork; J S Lanchbury
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Equivalence between Haseman-Elston and variance-components linkage analyses for sib pairs.

Authors:  P C Sham; S Purcell
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Linkage analysis of extremely discordant and concordant sibling pairs identifies quantitative-trait loci that influence variation in the human personality trait neuroticism.

Authors:  Jan Fullerton; Matthew Cubin; Hemant Tiwari; Chenxi Wang; Amarjit Bomhra; Stuart Davidson; Sue Miller; Christopher Fairburn; Guy Goodwin; Michael C Neale; Simon Fiddy; Richard Mott; David B Allison; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Powerful regression-based quantitative-trait linkage analysis of general pedigrees.

Authors:  Pak C Sham; Shaun Purcell; Stacey S Cherny; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Regression-based quantitative-trait-locus mapping in the 21st century.

Authors:  Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Bias toward the null hypothesis in model-free linkage analysis is highly dependent on the test statistic used.

Authors:  Heather J Cordell
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Mapping quantitative traits with random and with ascertained sibships.

Authors:  Jie Peng; D Siegmund
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Recent advances in human quantitative-trait-locus mapping: comparison of methods for discordant sibling pairs.

Authors:  Jin P Szatkiewicz; Karen T Cuenco; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.