Literature DB >> 11347689

Differences in osseointegration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains.

C A Simmons1, S A Meguid, R M Pilliar.   

Abstract

Experimental evidence indicates that the surface geometry of bone-interfacing implants influences the nature and rate of tissues formed around implants. In a previously reported animal model study, we showed that non-functional, press-fitted porous-surfaced implants placed in rabbit femoral condyle sites osseointegrated more rapidly than plasma-sprayed implants. We hypothesized that the accelerated osseointegration observed with the porous-surfaced design was the result of this design providing a local mechanical environment that was more favourable for bone formation. In the present study, we tested this hypothesis using finite element analysis and homogenization methods to predict the local strains in the pre-mineralized tissues formed around porous-surfaced and plasma-sprayed implants. We found that, for loading perpendicular to the implant interface, the porous surface structure provided a large region that experienced low distortional and volumetric strains, whereas the plasma-sprayed implant provided little local strain protection to the healing tissue. The strain protected region, which was within the pores of the sintered porous surface layer. corresponded to the region where the difference in the amount of mineralization between the two implant designs was the greatest. Low distortional and volumetric strains are believed to favour osteogenesis, and therefore the model results provide initial support for the hypothesis that the porous-surfaced geometry provides a local mechanical environment that favours more rapid bone formation in certain situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11347689     DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(00)90006-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  12 in total

1.  Effect of mechanical stimuli on skeletal regeneration around implants.

Authors:  Philipp Leucht; Jae-Beom Kim; Rima Wazen; Jennifer A Currey; Antonio Nanci; John B Brunski; Jill A Helms
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Nanoscale surface modifications of medically relevant metals: state-of-the art and perspectives.

Authors:  Fabio Variola; John B Brunski; Giovanna Orsini; Paulo Tambasco de Oliveira; Rima Wazen; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.790

3.  Bone response to immediate loading through titanium implants with different surface roughness in rats.

Authors:  Naoko Sato; Toshie Kuwana; Miou Yamamoto; Hanako Suenaga; Takahisa Anada; Shigeto Koyama; Osamu Suzuki; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  [Does osteoporosis lead to reduction the primary stability of cementless hip cups?].

Authors:  C von Schulze-Pellengahr; A Bürkner; T Lichtinger; W Teske; A Fottner; B Wegener; T Vogel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Fortifying the Bone-Implant Interface Part 2: An In Vivo Evaluation of 3D-Printed and TPS-Coated Triangular Implants.

Authors:  Regina F MacBarb; Derek P Lindsey; Shane A Woods; Peggy A Lalor; Mukund I Gundanna; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-01

6.  Micromotion-induced strain fields influence early stages of repair at bone-implant interfaces.

Authors:  Rima M Wazen; Jennifer A Currey; Hongqiang Guo; John B Brunski; Jill A Helms; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Time course of peri-implant bone regeneration around loaded and unloaded implants in a rat model.

Authors:  Shailly H Jariwala; Hwabok Wee; Evan P Roush; Tiffany L Whitcomb; Christopher Murter; Gery Kozlansky; Akhlesh Lakhtakia; Allen R Kunselman; Henry J Donahue; April D Armstrong; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  A paradigm for the development and evaluation of novel implant topologies for bone fixation: in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Jason P Long; Scott J Hollister; Steven A Goldstein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Microarchitecture of titanium cylinders obtained by additive manufacturing does not influence osseointegration in the sheep.

Authors:  Louis Rony; Eric Aguado; Bruno Verlee; Florence Pascaretti-Grizon; Daniel Chappard
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2021-06-25

10.  Three-dimensional modeling of removal torque and fracture progression around implants.

Authors:  Kohei Murase; Patrik Stenlund; Peter Thomsen; Jukka Lausmaa; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.