Literature DB >> 27381807

Time course of peri-implant bone regeneration around loaded and unloaded implants in a rat model.

Shailly H Jariwala1, Hwabok Wee1, Evan P Roush1, Tiffany L Whitcomb2, Christopher Murter1, Gery Kozlansky1, Akhlesh Lakhtakia3, Allen R Kunselman4, Henry J Donahue5, April D Armstrong1, Gregory S Lewis1.   

Abstract

The time-course of cancellous bone regeneration surrounding mechanically loaded implants affects implant fixation, and is relevant to determining optimal rehabilitation protocols following orthopaedic surgeries. We investigated the influence of controlled mechanical loading of titanium-coated polyether-ether ketone (PEEK) implants on osseointegration using time-lapsed, non-invasive, in vivo micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scans. Implants were inserted into proximal tibial metaphyses of both limbs of eight female Sprague-Dawley rats. External cyclic loading (60 or 100 μm displacement, 1 Hz, 60 s) was applied every other day for 14 days to one implant in each rat, while implants in contralateral limbs served as the unloaded controls. Hind limbs were imaged with high-resolution micro-CT (12.5 μm voxel size) at 2, 5, 9, and 12 days post-surgery. Trabecular changes over time were detected by 3D image registration allowing for measurements of bone-formation rate (BFR) and bone-resorption rate (BRR). At day 9, mean %BV/TV for loaded and unloaded limbs were 35.5 ± 10.0% and 37.2 ± 10.0%, respectively, and demonstrated significant increases in bone volume compared to day 2. BRR increased significantly after day 9. No significant differences between bone volumes, BFR, and BRR were detected due to implant loading. Although not reaching significance (p = 0.16), an average 119% increase in pull-out strength was measured in the loaded implants.
© 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:997-1006, 2017. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone remodeling; image registration; implant fixation; mechanical loading; micro-computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27381807      PMCID: PMC5800527          DOI: 10.1002/jor.23360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  47 in total

1.  Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone.

Authors:  R Huiskes; R Ruimerman; G H van Lenthe; J D Janssen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The influence of micro-motion on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants.

Authors:  J Duyck; K Vandamme; L Geris; H Van Oosterwyck; M De Cooman; J Vandersloten; R Puers; I Naert
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 2.633

3.  Ultrastructural characterization of the implant interface response to loading.

Authors:  X Zhang; J Duyck; K Vandamme; I Naert; G Carmeliet
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature.

Authors:  S Szmukler-Moncler; H Salama; Y Reingewirtz; J H Dubruille
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998

5.  Inter-observer and intra-observer variation in bone histomorphometry.

Authors:  J E Compston; S Vedi; A J Stellon
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Surface-mediated bone tissue morphogenesis from tunable nanolayered implant coatings.

Authors:  Nisarg J Shah; Md Nasim Hyder; Joshua S Moskowitz; Mohiuddin A Quadir; Stephen W Morton; Howard J Seeherman; Robert F Padera; Myron Spector; Paula T Hammond
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 7.  The effect of loading on peri-implant bone: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  J Duyck; K Vandamme
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.837

8.  Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants.

Authors:  R M Pilliar; J M Lee; C Maniatopoulos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Time course of bone screw fixation following a local delivery of Zoledronate in a rat femoral model - a micro-finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ulrike Kettenberger; Adeliya Latypova; Alexandre Terrier; Dominique P Pioletti
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-01-19

10.  Mineralizing surface is the main target of mechanical stimulation independent of age: 3D dynamic in vivo morphometry.

Authors:  Annette I Birkhold; Hajar Razi; Georg N Duda; Richard Weinkamer; Sara Checa; Bettina M Willie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  5 in total

1.  Mechanical regulation of bone formation and resorption around implants in a mouse model of osteopenic bone.

Authors:  Zihui Li; Duncan Betts; Gisela Kuhn; Michael Schirmer; Ralph Müller; Davide Ruffoni
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Impaired bone formation in ovariectomized mice reduces implant integration as indicated by longitudinal in vivo micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Zihui Li; Gisela Kuhn; Michael Schirmer; Ralph Müller; Davide Ruffoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  System for application of controlled forces on dental implants in rat maxillae: Influence of the number of load cycles on bone healing.

Authors:  Renan de Barros E Lima Bueno; Ana P Dias; Katia J Ponce; John B Brunski; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.368

4.  A novel surgical model for the preclinical assessment of the osseointegration of dental implants: a surgical protocol and pilot study results.

Authors:  Noura M AlOtaibi; Michael Dunne; Ashraf F Ayoub; Kurt B Naudi
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Bone healing response in cyclically loaded implants: Comparing zero, one, and two loading sessions per day.

Authors:  Renan de Barros E Lima Bueno; Ana Paula Dias; Katia J Ponce; Rima Wazen; John B Brunski; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-05-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.