Literature DB >> 23337705

Micromotion-induced strain fields influence early stages of repair at bone-implant interfaces.

Rima M Wazen1, Jennifer A Currey, Hongqiang Guo, John B Brunski, Jill A Helms, Antonio Nanci.   

Abstract

Implant loading can create micromotion at the bone-implant interface. The interfacial strain associated with implant micromotion could contribute to regulating the tissue healing response. Excessive micromotion can lead to fibrous encapsulation and implant loosening. Our objective was to characterize the influence of interfacial strain on bone regeneration around implants in mouse tibiae. A micromotion system was used to create strain under conditions of (1) no initial contact between implant and bone and (2) direct bone-implant contact. Pin- and screw-shaped implants were subjected to displacements of 150 or 300 μm for 60 cycles per day for 7 days. Pin-shaped implants placed in five animals were subjected to three sessions of 150 μm displacement per day, with 60 cycles per session. Control implants in both types of interfaces were stabilized throughout the healing period. Experimental strain analyses, microtomography, image-based displacement mapping, and finite element simulations were used to characterize interfacial strain fields. Calcified tissue sections were prepared and Goldner trichrome stained to evaluate the tissue reactions in higher and lower strain regions. In stable implants bone formation occurred consistently around the implants. In implants subjected to micromotion bone regeneration was disrupted in areas of high strain concentrations (e.g. >30%), whereas lower strain values were permissive of bone formation. Increasing implant displacement or number of cycles per day also changed the strain distribution and disturbed bone healing. These results indicate that not only implant micromotion but also the associated interfacial strain field contributes to regulating the interfacial mechanobiology at healing bone-implant interfaces.
Copyright © 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23337705      PMCID: PMC3622828          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  34 in total

1.  Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis.

Authors:  U Meyer; D Vollmer; C Runte; C Bourauel; U Joos
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Mechanical regulation of localized and appositional bone formation around bone-interfacing implants.

Authors:  C A Simmons; S A Meguid; R M Pilliar
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001-04

3.  Machine vision photogrammetry: a technique for measurement of microstructural strain in cortical bone.

Authors:  D P Nicolella; A E Nicholls; J Lankford; D T Davy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The effect of mechanical stability on local vascularization and tissue differentiation in callus healing.

Authors:  Lutz Claes; Kerstin Eckert-Hübner; Peter Augat
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology.

Authors:  Stephan M Perren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-11

6.  Cyclic strain enhances matrix mineralization by adult human mesenchymal stem cells via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) signaling pathway.

Authors:  Craig A Simmons; Sean Matlis; Amanda J Thornton; Shaoqiong Chen; Cun Yu Wang; David J Mooney
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Strain gradients correlate with sites of exercise-induced bone-forming surfaces in the adult skeleton.

Authors:  S Judex; T S Gross; R F Zernicke
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions.

Authors:  M Jasty; C Bragdon; D Burke; D O'Connor; J Lowenstein; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Critical review of immediate implant loading.

Authors:  Ricardo Gapski; Hom-Lay Wang; Paulo Mascarenhas; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Quantitative immunogold labeling of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin in methylmethacrylate-embedded rat bone.

Authors:  O Laboux; L-G Ste-Marie; F H Glorieux; A Nanci
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.479

View more
  37 in total

1.  Effects of mechanical loading on cortical defect repair using a novel mechanobiological model of bone healing.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Robert Carrera; Vittoria Flamini; Lena Kenny; Pamela Cabahug-Zuckerman; Benson M George; Daniel Hunter; Bo Liu; Gurpreet Singh; Philipp Leucht; Kenneth A Mann; Jill A Helms; Alesha B Castillo
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  The Scaffold-Articular Cartilage Interface: A Combined In Vitro and In Silico Analysis Under Controlled Loading Conditions.

Authors:  Tony Chen; Moira M McCarthy; Hongqiang Guo; Russell Warren; Suzanne A Maher
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Voxel-based micro-finite element analysis of dental implants in a human cadaveric mandible: Tissue modulus assignment and sensitivity analyses.

Authors:  Qiyuan Mao; Kangning Su; Yuxiao Zhou; Mehran Hossaini-Zadeh; Gregory S Lewis; Jing Du
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-03-13

4.  Biomechanical adaptation of the bone-periodontal ligament (PDL)-tooth fibrous joint as a consequence of disease.

Authors:  Jeremy D Lin; Jihyun Lee; Hüseyin Ozcoban; Gerold A Schneider; Sunita P Ho
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Bone formation around unstable implants is enhanced by a WNT protein therapeutic in a preclinical in vivo model.

Authors:  Benjamin R Coyac; Brian Leahy; Zhijun Li; Giuseppe Salvi; Xing Yin; John B Brunski; Jill A Helms
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  3D full-field strain in bone-implant and bone-tooth constructs and their morphological influential factors.

Authors:  Yuxiao Zhou; Chujie Gong; Mehran Hossaini-Zadeh; Jing Du
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-05-19

7.  Do Surface Porosity and Pore Size Influence Mechanical Properties and Cellular Response to PEEK?

Authors:  F Brennan Torstrick; Nathan T Evans; Hazel Y Stevens; Ken Gall; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  A pre-clinical murine model of oral implant osseointegration.

Authors:  S Mouraret; D J Hunter; C Bardet; J B Brunski; P Bouchard; J A Helms
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Micromechanical modeling of the contact stiffness of an osseointegrated bone-implant interface.

Authors:  Maria Letizia Raffa; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Guillaume Haiat
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Improving oral implant osseointegration in a murine model via Wnt signal amplification.

Authors:  Sylvain Mouraret; Daniel J Hunter; Claire Bardet; Antoine Popelut; John B Brunski; Catherine Chaussain; Philippe Bouchard; Jill A Helms
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 8.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.