Literature DB >> 11340869

Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: structural limitation or strategic postponement?

E Ruthruff1, H E Pashler, A Klaassen.   

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that a central bottleneck causes much of the slowing that occurs when two tasks are performed at the same time. This bottleneck might reflect a structural limitation inherent in the cognitive architecture. Alternatively, the bottleneck might reflect strategic (i.e., voluntary) postponement, induced by instructions to emphasize one task over the other. To distinguish structural limitations from strategic postponement, we examine a new paradigm in which subjects are told to place equal emphasis on both tasks and to emit both responses at about the same time. An experiment using this paradigm demonstrated patterns of interference that cannot easily be attributed to strategic postponement, preparation effects, or conflicts in response production. The data conform closely to the predictions of structural central bottleneck models.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11340869     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck.

Authors:  C Fagot; H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  On Rumelhart's model of visual information-processing.

Authors:  M Coltheart; V Coltheart
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1972-09

4.  Does mental rotation require central mechanisms?

Authors:  E Ruthruff; J Miller; T Lachmann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance.

Authors:  R De Jong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Attentional limits in memory retrieval.

Authors:  L M Carrier; H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.

Authors:  S Roberts; H Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  48 in total

1.  Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production.

Authors:  Victor S Ferreira; Harold Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

3.  Age-related emotional bias in processing two emotionally valenced tasks.

Authors:  Philip A Allen; Mei-Ching Lien; Elliott Jardin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-10-20

4.  Dual-task performance in older adults during discrete gait perturbation.

Authors:  Joseph O Nnodim; Hogene Kim; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Eliot Hazeltine; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-24

6.  Task switching and action sequencing.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-11-19

7.  Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.

Authors:  Jeff Miller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-20

8.  Isolation of a central bottleneck of information processing with time-resolved FMRI.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; Jason Ivanoff; Christopher L Asplund; René Marois
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Working memory involvement in dual-task performance: evidence from the backward compatibility effect.

Authors:  Ravid Ellenbogen; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

10.  Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment.

Authors:  François Maquestiaux; Maude Laguë-Beauvais; Eric Ruthruff; Louis Bherer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.