Literature DB >> 7790833

Does mental rotation require central mechanisms?

E Ruthruff1, J Miller, T Lachmann.   

Abstract

Four reaction time experiments examined the mental rotation process using a psychological refractory period paradigm. On each trial, participants made speeded responses to both a tone (S1) and a rotated letter (S2), presented with varying stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). If mental rotation of the stimulus letter can proceed while central mechanisms are busy with S1, then the effect of orientation should decrease substantially with decreasing SOA. Contrary to these predictions, the effect of orientation was nearly constant across SOAs, suggesting that mental rotation cannot effectively proceed without help from central mechanisms. These results support the conclusion that mental rotation requires access to a single-channel mechanism and must therefore be performed serially with other operations requiring the same mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7790833     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  25 in total

1.  Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: structural limitation or strategic postponement?

Authors:  E Ruthruff; H E Pashler; A Klaassen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Response time distributions: some simple effects of factors selectively influencing mental processes.

Authors:  R Schweickert; M Giorgini
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

3.  Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Central interference in error processing.

Authors:  Eldad Yitzhak Hochman; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

5.  On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Pierre Jolicoeur; Paola Sessa; Roberto Dell'Acqua; Nicolas Robitaille
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-24

6.  Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-06

7.  Goodness takes effort: perceptual organization in dual-task settings.

Authors:  Thomas Lachmann; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-26

8.  Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.

Authors:  Jeff Miller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-20

9.  Isolation of a central bottleneck of information processing with time-resolved FMRI.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; Jason Ivanoff; Christopher L Asplund; René Marois
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Training improves multitasking performance by increasing the speed of information processing in human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; Michael N Tombu; Stephenie Harrison; Baxter P Rogers; Frank Tong; René Marois
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.