Literature DB >> 18630203

Working memory involvement in dual-task performance: evidence from the backward compatibility effect.

Ravid Ellenbogen1, Nachshon Meiran.   

Abstract

In three experiments, the authors supported the hypothesis that parallel response activation seen in dual-task performance results from holding Task 2 rules in working memory (WM) while performing Task 1. To this end, the authors used the backward compatibility effect (BCE; quicker primary responses when the Task 2 response is compatible with codes of Task 1) as a marker for parallel response activation and manipulated WM load. Increasing the number of primary task rules from two to four did not modulate BCE, replicating Hommel and Eglau (2002), but a higher load condition, involving six primary task rules, reduced the BCE to nonsignificant levels. Experiment 3 further showed that WM is loaded by rules associating abstract stimulus categories to responses, and not by rules that associate individual stimuli to responses (S-R rules).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18630203     DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.5.968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  31 in total

1.  Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance.

Authors:  M C Lien; R W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory.

Authors:  G D Logan; M D Schulkind
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory.

Authors:  G D Logan; J A Delheimer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  An instance theory of attention and memory.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Richard Schweickert; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: graded capacity sharing or central postponement?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Harold E Pashler; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-07

8.  Increased control demand results in serial processing: evidence from dual-task performance.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-10

9.  Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.

Authors:  Jeff Miller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-20

Review 10.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.

Authors:  D E Meyer; D E Kieras
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  14 in total

1.  Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: evidence from tasks with the same and with different task sets.

Authors:  Carola Lehle; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

Review 2.  Monitoring and control in multitasking.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; David Dignath; Marco Steinhauser; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

3.  PRP training shows Task1 response selection is the locus of the backward response compatibility effect.

Authors:  Sandra J Thomson; Lila K Danis; Scott Watter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

4.  Action effect features, but not anatomical features, determine the Backward Crosstalk Effect: evidence from crossed-hands experiments.

Authors:  Sandra Renas; Moritz Durst; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-15

5.  Removing the frontal lobes: the effects of engaging executive functions on perceptual category learning.

Authors:  J Vincent Filoteo; Scott Lauritzen; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-02-16

6.  The reaction-time task-rule congruency effect is not affected by working memory load: further support for the activated long-term memory hypothesis.

Authors:  Yoav Kessler; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-10-30

7.  When planning results in loss of control: intention-based reflexivity and working-memory.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Michael W Cole; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Transfer after Working Memory Updating Training.

Authors:  Otto Waris; Anna Soveri; Matti Laine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mechanisms of Practice-Related Reductions of Dual-Task Interference with Simple Tasks: Data and Theory.

Authors:  Tilo Strobach; Schubert Torsten
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

10.  Cross-modal Action Complexity: Action- and Rule-related Memory Retrieval in Dual-response Control.

Authors:  Aleks Pieczykolan; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.