Literature DB >> 1431744

Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck.

C Fagot1, H Pashler.   

Abstract

Experiments with two stimuli and two responses have revealed a central attentional bottleneck and pointed to response selection as its primary locus; however, little has been said about the underlying reasons for this bottleneck. Here we explore these reasons. In the first three experiments, Ss made two separate responses to different aspects of the same object. Interference between selection of the responses persisted, ruling out the possibility that the dual-task bottleneck is caused by the input to the response-selection mechanism being limited to one object at a time. The next four experiments examined what happens when two responses are made to the same attribute of a single object. These experiments show that only one response selection occurred. Hence, the central mechanism is not limited to picking one motor action at a time. Several possible theories about the nature of the bottleneck are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1431744     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.1058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  33 in total

1.  Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: structural limitation or strategic postponement?

Authors:  E Ruthruff; H E Pashler; A Klaassen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

Review 2.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

3.  Semantic picture-word interference is a postperceptual effect.

Authors:  Tatiana T Schnur; Randi Martin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

4.  Crossmodal action selection: evidence from dual-task compatibility.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

5.  Goodness takes effort: perceptual organization in dual-task settings.

Authors:  Thomas Lachmann; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-26

Review 6.  A presentation of attentional semantics.

Authors:  Giorgio Marchetti
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2006-08-04

7.  Does response modality influence conflict? Modelling vocal and manual response Stroop interference.

Authors:  Alex Fennell; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect.

Authors:  R Dell'Acqua; R Job; F Peressotti; A Pascali
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

Review 9.  Studies on time: a proposal on how to get out of circularity.

Authors:  Giorgio Marchetti
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-05-27

Review 10.  Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Hedderik van Rijn; Jelmer P Borst
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.