Literature DB >> 11339767

Tissue mimicking materials for a multi-imaging modality prostate phantom.

W D D'Souza1, E L Madsen, O Unal, K K Vigen, G R Frank, B R Thomadsen.   

Abstract

Materials that simultaneously mimic soft tissue in vivo for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), and computed tomography (CT) for use in a prostate phantom have been developed. Prostate and muscle mimicking materials contain water, agarose, lipid particles, protein, Cu++, EDTA, glass beads, and thimerosal (preservative). Fat was mimicked with safflower oil suffusing a random mesh (network) of polyurethane. Phantom material properties were measured at 22 degrees C. (22 degrees C is a typical room temperature at which phantoms are used.) The values of material properties should match, as well as possible, the values for tissues at body temperature, 37 degrees C. For MRI, the primary properties of interest are T1 and T2 relaxations times, for US they are the attenuation coefficient, propagation speed, and backscatter, and for CT, the x-ray attenuation. Considering the large number of parameters to be mimicked, rather good agreement was found with actual tissue values obtained from the literature. Using published values for prostate parenchyma, T1 and T2 at 37 degrees C and 40 MHz are estimated to be about 1,100 and 98 ms, respectively. The CT number for in vivo prostate is estimated to be 45 HU (Hounsfield units). The prostate mimicking material has a T1 of 937 ms and a T2 of 88 ms at 22 degrees C and 40 MHz; the propagation speed and attenuation coefficient slope are 1,540 m/s and 0.36 dB/cm/MHz, respectively, and the CT number of tissue mimicking prostate is 43 HU. Tissue mimicking (TM) muscle differs from TM prostate in the amount of dry weight agarose, Cu++, EDTA, and the quality and quantity of glass beads. The 18 microm glass beads used in TM muscle increase US backscatter and US attenuation; the presence of the beads also has some effect on T1 but no effect on T2. The composition of tissue-mimicking materials developed is such that different versions can be placed in direct contact with one another in a phantom with no long term change in US, MRI, or CT properties. Thus, anthropomorphic phantoms can be constructed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11339767     DOI: 10.1118/1.1354998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  Effect of Frequency-Dependent Attenuation on Predicted Histotripsy Waveforms in Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Michael J Crowe; Jason L Raymond; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Characterizing and eliminating errors in enhancement and subtraction artifacts in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI: Chemical shift artifact of the third kind.

Authors:  Jamal J Derakhshan; Elizabeth S McDonald; Evan S Siegelman; Mitchell D Schnall; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Patient-specific ultrasound liver phantom: materials and fabrication method.

Authors:  Alessia Pacioni; Marina Carbone; Cinzia Freschi; Rosanna Viglialoro; Vincenzo Ferrari; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Gold nanoparticle contrast in a phantom and juvenile swine: models for molecular imaging of human organs using x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  Evan Boote; Genevieve Fent; Vijaya Kattumuri; Stan Casteel; Kavita Katti; Nripen Chanda; Raghuraman Kannan; Kattesh Katti; Robert Churchill
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  Criteria for the design of tissue-mimicking phantoms for the standardization of biophotonic instrumentation.

Authors:  Lina Hacker; Heidrun Wabnitz; Antonio Pifferi; T Joshua Pfefer; Brian W Pogue; Sarah E Bohndiek
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 25.671

6.  Tissue mimicking materials for the detection of prostate cancer using shear wave elastography: a validation study.

Authors:  Rui Cao; Zhihong Huang; Tomy Varghese; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Construction of a preclinical multimodality phantom using tissue-mimicking materials for quality assurance in tumor size measurement.

Authors:  Yongsook C Lee; Gary D Fullerton; Beth A Goins
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Preclinical multimodality phantom design for quality assurance of tumor size measurement.

Authors:  Yongsook C Lee; Gary D Fullerton; Cristel Baiu; Margaret G Lescrenier; Beth A Goins
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2011-09-30

Review 9.  Quality assurance guidelines for superficial hyperthermia clinical trials : II. Technical requirements for heating devices.

Authors:  Hana Dobšíček Trefná; Johannes Crezee; Manfred Schmidt; Dietmar Marder; Ulf Lamprecht; Michael Ehmann; Jacek Nadobny; Josefin Hartmann; Nicolleta Lomax; Sultan Abdel-Rahman; Sergio Curto; Akke Bakker; Mark D Hurwitz; Chris J Diederich; Paul R Stauffer; Gerard C Van Rhoon
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Patient-specific neurosurgical phantom: assessment of visual quality, accuracy, and scaling effects.

Authors:  Felipe Wilker Grillo; Victor Hugo Souza; Renan Hiroshi Matsuda; Carlo Rondinoni; Theo Zeferino Pavan; Oswaldo Baffa; Helio Rubens Machado; Antonio Adilton Oliveira Carneiro
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2018-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.