Literature DB >> 21090905

What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search?

Evan M Palmer1, Todd S Horowitz, Antonio Torralba, Jeremy M Wolfe.   

Abstract

Many visual search experiments measure response time (RT) as their primary dependent variable. Analyses typically focus on mean (or median) RT. However, given enough data, the RT distribution can be a rich source of information. For this paper, we collected about 500 trials per cell per observer for both target-present and target-absent displays in each of three classic search tasks: feature search, with the target defined by color; conjunction search, with the target defined by both color and orientation; and spatial configuration search for a 2 among distractor 5s. This large data set allows us to characterize the RT distributions in detail. We present the raw RT distributions and fit several psychologically motivated functions (ex-Gaussian, ex-Wald, Gamma, and Weibull) to the data. We analyze and interpret parameter trends from these four functions within the context of theories of visual search. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21090905      PMCID: PMC3062635          DOI: 10.1037/a0020747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  36 in total

1.  Levels of selective attention revealed through analyses of response time distributions.

Authors:  D H Spieler; D A Balota; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The ex-Wald distribution as a descriptive model of response times.

Authors:  W Schwarz
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2001-11

4.  On the manifestations of memory in visual search.

Authors:  D I Shore; R M Klein
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2000

5.  Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type.

Authors:  D H Spieler; D A Balota; M E Faust
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement.

Authors:  J Duncan; G Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision.

Authors:  John Palmer; Alexander C Huk; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Fitting wald and ex-Wald distributions to response time data: an example using functions for the S-PLUS package.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-11

9.  Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors.

Authors:  S L Burbeck; R D Luce
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-08

10.  Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Evan M Palmer; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  34 in total

1.  Effects of biofeedback on secondary-task response time and postural stability in older adults.

Authors:  Stephanie Haggerty; Liang-Ting Jiang; Andrzej Galecki; Kathleen H Sienko
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

3.  Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; David A Balota; Daragh E Sibley; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effects of saccade training on express saccade proportions, saccade latencies, and peak velocities: an investigation of nasal/temporal differences.

Authors:  Ómar I Jóhannesson; Jay A Edelman; Bjarki Dalsgaard Sigurþórsson; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  From salience to saccades: multiple-alternative gated stochastic accumulator model of visual search.

Authors:  Braden A Purcell; Jeffrey D Schall; Gordon D Logan; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Dysfunctional Neural Processes Underlying Context Processing Deficits in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Seung Suk Kang; Angus W MacDonald; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-04-10

7.  Pace Yourself: Intraindividual Variability in Context Use Revealed by Self-paced Event-related Brain Potentials.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Sage E P Boettcher; Emilie L Josephs; Corbin A Cunningham; Trafton Drew
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Major issues in the study of visual search: Part 2 of "40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman".

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Evan M Palmer; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.