Literature DB >> 35903077

Applying the Hearing Aid Fitting Standard to Selection for Adults.

Erin M Picou1, Richard A Roberts1, Gina Angley1, Todd A Ricketts1.   

Abstract

The recent hearing aid fitting standard for adults outlines the minimum practice for audiologists fitting adult patients with hearing loss. This article focuses on three items of the standard (5, 6, and 7), which focus on the selection of unilateral/bilateral hearing aids, hearing aid style, and coupling, in addition to feature selection. The standard emphasizes that decisions around these three aspects should be recommended for a patient in an individualized manner, based on their needs assessment. For these decisions, the needs assessment might include measures of speech-in-noise ability, social network size, patient preference, and a trial period. Additional elements could include assessments of manual dexterity, binaural interference, and attitude toward hearing aids. However, there are a multitude of ways to practice clinically and still meet the items outlined in the standard. As long as the selection decisions consider individualized patient factors and are capable of meeting validated prescriptive targets, a clinician would be meeting the adult hearing aid fitting minimum standard guidance. In addition, despite the large number of past studies supporting these standards, additional, high-quality research including randomized, controlled, clinical trials are still needed to further support appropriate minimum standard recommendations. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adults; hearing aid fitting; hearing loss; standard

Year:  2022        PMID: 35903077      PMCID: PMC9325089          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hear        ISSN: 0734-0451


  75 in total

1.  Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Kathryn S Schwartz; Colleen M Noe; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies.

Authors:  Ruth Bentler; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Jerrica Kettel; Richard Hurtig
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Rehabilitation approaches to promote successful unilateral and bilateral fittings and avoid inappropriate prescription.

Authors:  Louise Hickson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Syed Shabih Hasan; Anne Welhaven; Jacob Oleson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.

Authors:  Harvey B Abrams; Theresa H Chisolm; Megan McManus; Rachel McArdle
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: differences and similarities in binaural performance.

Authors:  Susanne Köbler; Ann-Cathrine Lindblad; Ake Olofsson; Björn Hagerman
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Hearing aid insertion: correlation between patients' confidence and ability.

Authors:  D D Pothier; C Bredenkamp
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.469

8.  Subjective comparisons of binaural versus monaural amplification.

Authors:  S A Erdman; R K Sedge
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Description, Normative Data, and Utility of the Hearing Aid Skills and Knowledge Test.

Authors:  Gabrielle H Saunders; Charlotte Morse-Fortier; Daniel J McDermott; Jay J Vachhani; Leslie D Grush; Susan Griest; M Samantha Lewis
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Acceptability of binaural hearing aids: a cross-over study.

Authors:  S D Stephens; D E Callaghan; S Hogan; R Meredith; A Rayment; A Davis
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.