Literature DB >> 35903071

APSO Standards: Implementing Hearing Aid Needs Assessments and Measuring Related Outcomes.

Michelle L Arnold1, Victoria A Sanchez2.   

Abstract

The proportion of individuals who pose to benefit from the use of hearing aids is much smaller than those who adopt them. Likewise, many adults who try hearing devices abandon using them after a short period of time. Most factors related to hearing aid use are unrelated to a patient's hearing loss severity. Hearing loss treatment requires more than the provision of hearing aids as a sole intervention. Adoption rates could be improved through the implementation of evidence-based clinical protocols which maximize patients' success. Recently, the Audiology Practice Standards Organization (APSO) released evidence-based, formal standards of practice addressing hearing aid selection, fitting, and rehabilitation for adult and geriatric patients. Notably, the standards acknowledge the importance of an amplification needs assessment, including hearing aid outcomes measurement. In this brief narrative, we describe Standards 3 and 14 ( Needs Assessment and Hearing Aid Outcomes Measurement ) and offer an example of the clinical implementation of a comprehensive needs assessment and hearing aid outcomes measurement currently being used in a multisite, longitudinal clinical trial. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adults; geriatrics; hearing aids; hearing loss; outcome measurement

Year:  2022        PMID: 35903071      PMCID: PMC9325087          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hear        ISSN: 0734-0451


  34 in total

1.  A test to measure subjective and objective speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Gabrielle H Saunders; Kathleen M Cienkowski
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure.

Authors:  R A Bentler; S E Kramer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Extending the IOI to significant others and to non-hearing-aid-based interventions.

Authors:  William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 5.  A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force On the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults.

Authors:  Theresa Hnath Chisolm; Carole E Johnson; Jeffrey L Danhauer; Laural J P Portz; Harvey B Abrams; Sharon Lesner; Patricia A McCarthy; Craig W Newman
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 6.  Hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults.

Authors:  Melanie A Ferguson; Pádraig T Kitterick; Lee Yee Chong; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Fiona Barker; Derek J Hoare
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-25

Review 7.  Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Line Vestergaard Knudsen; Marie Oberg; Claus Nielsen; Graham Naylor; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09

8.  The association of hearing impairment and chronic diseases with psychosocial health status in older age.

Authors:  Sophia E Kramer; Theo S Kapteyn; Dirk J Kuik; Dorly J H Deeg
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2002-02

9.  The Hearing Intervention for the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders Randomized Control Trial: Manualization and Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Victoria A Sanchez; Michelle L Arnold; Nicholas S Reed; Preyanca H Oree; Courtney R Matthews; Ann Clock Eddins; Frank R Lin; Theresa H Chisolm
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Hearing treatment for reducing cognitive decline: Design and methods of the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer A Deal; Adele M Goman; Marilyn S Albert; Michelle L Arnold; Sheila Burgard; Theresa Chisolm; David Couper; Nancy W Glynn; Theresa Gmelin; Kathleen M Hayden; Thomas Mosley; James S Pankow; Nicholas Reed; Victoria A Sanchez; A Richey Sharrett; Sonia D Thomas; Josef Coresh; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2018-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.