Literature DB >> 11311841

Psychological response to prenatal genetic counseling and amniocentesis.

K P Tercyak1, S B Johnson, S F Roberts, A C Cruz.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to characterize the psychological status (attitudes toward selective abortion, perceived risk, comprehension, patient satisfaction, coping, and state anxiety) of pregnant women at increased risk for fetal genetic anomalies who were referred for prenatal genetic counseling and amniocentesis; to determine which of these factors would predict amniocentesis use; and to identify patient outcomes associated with counseling and testing. Participants were 129 women aged 18 years and older who had one or more fetal genetic risk factors. All were recruited from an urban women's health clinic. The results revealed elevated perceptions of risk and moderate state anxiety despite adequate comprehension of, and patient satisfaction with, the process and content of genetic counseling. Approximately 78% agreed to testing; those who consented were more likely to hold favorable attitudes toward abortion than those who refused. Post-counseling, women experienced decrease in their perceived risk of having a baby born with a birth defect although perceived risk estimates remained higher than actual risks. Anxiety was clinically elevated and highest at the pre-counseling stage, though it dissipated to normal levels over time. Previous experience with prenatal diagnostic testing, increased perceived risk of a birth anomaly, and favorable attitudes toward abortion were independently associated with increased pre-counseling anxiety. Women who were more anxious pre-counseling remained more anxious post-counseling. Coping (high versus low monitoring) was unrelated to anxiety. These findings suggest that women who participate in prenatal counseling and testing may be subject to experience distress and unrealistic perceptions of their risk and may benefit from interventions designed to lessen these states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11311841     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00146-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  29 in total

1.  Perceived relevance of genetic carrier screening: observations of the role of health-related life experiences and stage of life in decision making.

Authors:  Alison D Archibald; Belinda J McClaren
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-11-17

2.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Invasive prenatal testing decisions in pregnancy after infertility.

Authors:  Colleen Caleshu; Shoshana Shiloh; Cristofer Price; Julie Sapp; Barbara Biesecker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Impacts of variants of uncertain significance on parental perceptions of children after prenatal chromosome microarray testing.

Authors:  Preeya Desai; Hannah Haber; Jessica Bulafka; Amita Russell; Rebecca Clifton; Julia Zachary; Seonjoo Lee; Tianshu Feng; Ronald Wapner; Catherine Monk; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  "Don't Want No Risk and Don't Want No Problems": Public Understandings of the Risks and Benefits of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the United States.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Lauren Carter Sayres; Taylor Goodspeed; Marsha Michie; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015

7.  Genetic testing likelihood: the impact of abortion views and quality of life information on women's decisions.

Authors:  Jessica L Wilson; Gail M Ferguson; Judith M Thorn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Nationwide survey for current clinical status of amniocentesis and maternal serum marker test in Japan.

Authors:  Hidehiko Miyake; Shigehito Yamada; Yosuke Fujii; Hideaki Sawai; Naoko Arimori; Yasuko Yamanouchi; Yuka Ozasa; Makoto Kanai; Haruhiko Sago; Akihiko Sekizawa; Fumio Takada; Hideaki Masuzaki; Yoichi Matsubara; Fumiki Hirahara; Koji Kugu
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  The decision-making process, experience, and perceptions of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) users.

Authors:  Shachar Zuckerman; Sigal Gooldin; David A Zeevi; Gheona Altarescu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Women's satisfaction with genetic counseling for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer: psychological aspects.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Tiffani A Demarco; Bryn D Mars; Beth N Peshkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.