Shachar Zuckerman1,2, Sigal Gooldin3, David A Zeevi4, Gheona Altarescu5,6,4. 1. Shaare Zedek Medical Center- Medical Genetics Institute, Jerusalem, Israel. Shachar.zuckerman@mail.huji.ac.il. 2. Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University , Jerusalem, Israel. Shachar.zuckerman@mail.huji.ac.il. 3. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel. 4. Shaare Zedek Medical Center- Preimplantation Genetic Unit, Jerusalem, Israel. 5. Shaare Zedek Medical Center- Medical Genetics Institute, Jerusalem, Israel. 6. Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University , Jerusalem, Israel.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The decision to undergo preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) entails a variety of personal and societal variables. Although PGT technology is widely accepted and used, few studies have queried the motives and concerns of PGT users; moreover, in-depth qualitative data regarding the PGT experience is scant. METHODS: In order to explore and analyze the experience, concerns, expectations, and attitudes toward the PGT technique and its implications, semi-structured interviews were conducted in a single tertiary medical center with 43 Israeli PGT users for HLA matching and autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked genetic disorders. RESULTS: The primary considerations in choosing PGT were prevention of birth of a child who would suffer a terminal or chronic disease as well as abrogation of a familial genetic condition. Religion played a decisive role in accepting PGT as an antenatal option. Regarding satisfaction with the PGT experience, many interviewees highlighted the need for greater attention to be given to potential stages of failure throughout the procedure and the need for emotional support. Our clinical results regarding implantation rate and cumulative live birth rate are 38-40% and 27-30%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This survey broadens understanding of the specialized needs of women, couples, and minority groups undergoing PGT and underscores the relevance of counseling services for PGT users.
PURPOSE: The decision to undergo preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) entails a variety of personal and societal variables. Although PGT technology is widely accepted and used, few studies have queried the motives and concerns of PGT users; moreover, in-depth qualitative data regarding the PGT experience is scant. METHODS: In order to explore and analyze the experience, concerns, expectations, and attitudes toward the PGT technique and its implications, semi-structured interviews were conducted in a single tertiary medical center with 43 Israeli PGT users for HLA matching and autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked genetic disorders. RESULTS: The primary considerations in choosing PGT were prevention of birth of a child who would suffer a terminal or chronic disease as well as abrogation of a familial genetic condition. Religion played a decisive role in accepting PGT as an antenatal option. Regarding satisfaction with the PGT experience, many interviewees highlighted the need for greater attention to be given to potential stages of failure throughout the procedure and the need for emotional support. Our clinical results regarding implantation rate and cumulative live birth rate are 38-40% and 27-30%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This survey broadens understanding of the specialized needs of women, couples, and minority groups undergoing PGT and underscores the relevance of counseling services for PGT users.
Authors: J C Harper; L Wilton; J Traeger-Synodinos; V Goossens; C Moutou; S B SenGupta; T Pehlivan Budak; P Renwick; M De Rycke; J P M Geraedts; G Harton Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 15.610