Literature DB >> 9666987

External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms.

Z L Lu1, B A Dosher.   

Abstract

We developed and tested a powerful method for identifying and characterizing the effect of attention on performance in visual tasks as due to signal enhancement, distractor exclusion, or internal noise suppression. Based on a noisy Perceptual Template Model (PTM) of a human observer, the method adds increasing amounts of external noise (white gaussian random noise) to the visual stimulus and observes the effect on performance of a perceptual task for attended and unattended stimuli. The three mechanisms of attention yield three "signature" patterns of performance. The general framework for characterizing the mechanisms of attention is used here to investigate the attentional mechanisms in a concurrent location-cued orientation discrimination task. Test stimuli--Gabor patches tilted slightly to the right or left--always appeared on both the left and the right of fixation, and varied independently. Observers were cued on each trial to attend to the left, the right, or evenly to both stimuli, and decide the direction of tilt of both test stimuli. For eight levels of added external noise and three attention conditions (attended, unattended, and equal), subjects' contrast threshold levels were determined. At low levels of external noise, attention affected threshold contrast: threshold contrasts for non-attended stimuli were systematically higher than for equal attention stimuli, which were, in turn, higher than for attended stimuli. Specifically, when the rms contrast of the external noise is below 10%, there is a consistent 17% elevation of contrast threshold from attended to unattended condition across all three subjects. For higher levels of external noise, attention conditions did not affect threshold contrast values at all. These strong results are characteristic of a signal enhancement, or equivalently, an internal additive noise reduction mechanism of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9666987     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00273-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  156 in total

1.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing.

Authors:  M Carrasco; B McElree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement.

Authors:  M Carrasco; C Penpeci-Talgar; M Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Areas involved in encoding and applying directional expectations to moving objects.

Authors:  G L Shulman; J M Ollinger; E Akbudak; T E Conturo; A Z Snyder; S E Petersen; M Corbetta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

5.  Attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Sam Ling; Sarah Read
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Brian Maniscalco; Tashina Graves; Elliott Huang; Floris P de Lange; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Visual recovery in cortical blindness is limited by high internal noise.

Authors:  Matthew R Cavanaugh; Ruyuan Zhang; Michael D Melnick; Anasuya Das; Mariel Roberts; Duje Tadin; Marisa Carrasco; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Computational and human observer image quality evaluation of low dose, knowledge-based CT iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Brendan L Eck; Rachid Fahmi; Kevin M Brown; Stanislav Zabic; Nilgoun Raihani; Jun Miao; David L Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  How attention influences perceptual decision making: Single-trial EEG correlates of drift-diffusion model parameters.

Authors:  Michael D Nunez; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.223

10.  The role of judgment frames and task precision in object attention: Reduced template sharpness limits dual-object performance.

Authors:  Shiau-Hua Liu; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.