Literature DB >> 11277293

Nonlinear behavior of trabecular bone at small strains.

E F Morgan1, O C Yeh, W C Chang, T M Keaveny.   

Abstract

Study of the behavior of trabecular bone at strains below 0.40 percent is of clinical and biomechanical importance. The goal of this work was to characterize, with respect to anatomic site, loading mode, and apparent density, the subtle concave downward stress-strain nonlinearity, that has been observed recently for trabecular bone at these strains. Using protocols designed to minimize end-artifacts, 155 cylindrical cores from human vertebrae, proximal tibiae, proximal femora, and bovine proximal tibiae were mechanically tested to yield at 0.50 percent strain per second in tension or compression. The nonlinearity was quantified by the reduction in tangent modulus at 0.20 percent and 0.40 percent strain as compared to the initial modulus. For the pooled data, the mean +/- SD percentage reduction in tangent modulus at 0.20 percent strain was 9.07+/- 3.24 percent in compression and 13.8 +/- 4.79 percent in tension. At 0.40 percent strain, these values were 23.5 +/- 5.71 and 35.7+/- 7.10 percent, respectively. The magnitude of the nonlineari't depended on both anatomic site (p < 0.001) and loading mode (p < 0.001), and in tension was positively correlated with density. Calculated values of elastic modulus and yield properties depended on the strain range chosen to define modulus via a linear curve fit (p < 0.005). Mean percent differences in 0.20 percent offset yield strains were as large as 10.65 percent for some human sites. These results establish that trabecular bone exhibits nonlinearity at low strains, and that this behavior can confound intersite comparisons of mechanical properties. A nonlinear characterization of the small strain behavior of trabecular bone was introduced to characterize the initial stress-strain behavior more thoroughly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11277293     DOI: 10.1115/1.1338122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  22 in total

1.  Detection of trabecular bone microdamage by micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Xiang Wang; Daniel B Masse; Huijie Leng; Kevin P Hess; Ryan D Ross; Ryan K Roeder; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of finger joint stresses in the MCP joint while performing common tasks.

Authors:  Kent D Butz; Greg Merrell; Eric A Nauman
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-09

3.  Effect of sacral slope on the biomechanical behavior of the low lumbar spine.

Authors:  Yugang Jiang; Xiaojiang Sun; Xiongqi Peng; Jie Zhao; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Mechanical failure begins preferentially near resorption cavities in human vertebral cancellous bone under compression.

Authors:  C R Slyfield; E V Tkachenko; S E Fischer; K M Ehlert; I H Yi; M G Jekir; R G O'Brien; T M Keaveny; C J Hernandez
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Shear strength and toughness of trabecular bone are more sensitive to density than damage.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Garrison; Joshua A Gargac; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Variability of tissue mineral density can determine physiological creep of human vertebral cancellous bone.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Daniel Shertok; Boon Ching Tee; Yener N Yeni
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  On challenges in clinical assessment of hip fracture risk using image-based biomechanical modelling: a critical review.

Authors:  Yunhua Luo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Quantitative relationships between microdamage and cancellous bone strength and stiffness.

Authors:  C J Hernandez; F M Lambers; J Widjaja; C Chapa; C M Rimnac
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  In vivo microdamage is an indicator of susceptibility to initiation and propagation of microdamage in human femoral trabecular bone.

Authors:  Ziheng Wu; Anthony J Laneve; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Density and architecture have greater effects on the toughness of trabecular bone than damage.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Garrison; Constance L Slaboch; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.