Literature DB >> 24928495

Quantitative relationships between microdamage and cancellous bone strength and stiffness.

C J Hernandez1, F M Lambers2, J Widjaja2, C Chapa2, C M Rimnac3.   

Abstract

Microscopic tissue damage (microdamage) is an aspect of bone quality associated with impaired bone mechanical performance. While it is clear that bone tissue submitted to more severe loading has greater amounts of microdamage (as measured through staining), how microdamage influences future mechanical performance of the bone has not been well studied, yet is necessary for understanding the mechanical consequences of the presence of microdamage. Here we determine how stained microdamage generated by a single compressive overload affects subsequent biomechanical performance of cancellous bone. Human vertebral cancellous bone specimens (n=47) from 23 donors (14 males, 9 females, 64-92years of age) were submitted to a compressive overload, stained for microdamage, then reloaded in compression to determine the relationship between the amount of microdamage caused by the initial load and reductions in mechanical performance during the reload. Damage volume fraction (DV/BV) caused by the initial overload was related to reductions in Young's modulus, yield strength, ultimate strength, and yield strain upon reloading (p<0.05, R(2)=0.18-0.34). The regression models suggest that, on average, relatively small amounts of microdamage are associated with large reductions in reload mechanical properties: a 1.50% DV/BV caused by a compressive overload was associated with an average reduction in Young's modulus of 41.0±3.2% (mean±SE), an average reduction in yield strength of 63.1±4.5% and an average reduction in ultimate strength of 52.7±4.0%. Specimens loaded beyond 1.2% (1.2-4.0% apparent strain) demonstrated a single relationship between reload mechanical properties (Young's modulus, yield strength, and ultimate strength) and bone volume fraction despite a large range in amounts of microdamage. Hence, estimates of future mechanical performance of cancellous bone can be achieved using the bone volume fraction and whether or not a specimen was previously loaded beyond ultimate strain. The empirical relationships provided in this study make it possible to estimate the degree of impaired mechanical performance resulting from an observed amount of stained microdamage.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Bone quality; Cancellous bone; Mechanical testing; Microdamage

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24928495      PMCID: PMC4125443          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  43 in total

1.  Nonlinear behavior of trabecular bone at small strains.

Authors:  E F Morgan; O C Yeh; W C Chang; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Ageing human bone: factors affecting its biomechanical properties and the role of collagen.

Authors:  P Zioupos
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.646

3.  Sequential labelling of microdamage in bone using chelating agents.

Authors:  T C Lee; T L Arthur; L J Gibson; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Microdamage accumulation in bovine trabecular bone in uniaxial compression.

Authors:  T L Arthur Moore; L J Gibson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Christopher E Cann; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Microdamage and bone strength.

Authors:  David Burr
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Age-related changes in human trabecular bone: Relationship between microstructural stress and strain and damage morphology.

Authors:  Jessica O Green; Srinidhi Nagaraja; Tamim Diab; Brani Vidakovic; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  In vivo diffuse damage in human vertebral trabecular bone.

Authors:  D Vashishth; J Koontz; S J Qiu; D Lundin-Cannon; Y N Yeni; M B Schaffler; D P Fyhrie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Microcrack accumulation at different intervals during fatigue testing of compact bone.

Authors:  Fergal J O'Brien; David Taylor; T Clive Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Microdamage caused by fatigue loading in human cancellous bone: relationship to reductions in bone biomechanical performance.

Authors:  Floor M Lambers; Amanda R Bouman; Clare M Rimnac; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

1.  Fatigue life of bovine meniscus under longitudinal and transverse tensile loading.

Authors:  Jaremy J Creechley; Madison E Krentz; Trevor J Lujan
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-12-27

2.  Biomechanical analysis of spino-pelvic postural configurations in spondylolysis subjected to various sport-related dynamic loading conditions.

Authors:  Manon Sterba; Pierre-Jean Arnoux; Hubert Labelle; William C Warner; Carl-Éric Aubin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Material heterogeneity in cancellous bone promotes deformation recovery after mechanical failure.

Authors:  Ashley M Torres; Jonathan B Matheny; Tony M Keaveny; David Taylor; Clare M Rimnac; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The effects of tensile-compressive loading mode and microarchitecture on microdamage in human vertebral cancellous bone.

Authors:  Floor M Lambers; Amanda R Bouman; Evgeniy V Tkachenko; Tony M Keaveny; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Morphometric measurements can improve prediction of progressive vertebral deformity following vertebral damage.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Patricia Dolan; Michael A Adams; Deborah J Annesley-Williams
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The roles of architecture and estrogen depletion in microdamage risk in trabecular bone.

Authors:  Tyler C Kreipke; Jacqueline G Garrison; Jeremiah Easley; A Simon Turner; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Finite element models predict the location of microdamage in cancellous bone following uniaxial loading.

Authors:  M G Goff; F M Lambers; R M Sorna; T M Keaveny; C J Hernandez
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Structural strength of cancellous specimens from bovine femur under cyclic compression.

Authors:  Kaori Endo; Satoshi Yamada; Masahiro Todoh; Masahiko Takahata; Norimasa Iwasaki; Shigeru Tadano
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Standardizing compression testing for measuring the stiffness of human bone.

Authors:  S Zhao; M Arnold; S Ma; R L Abel; J P Cobb; U Hansen; O Boughton
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Relations Between Bone Quantity, Microarchitecture, and Collagen Cross-links on Mechanics Following In Vivo Irradiation in Mice.

Authors:  Megan M Pendleton; Shannon R Emerzian; Saghi Sadoughi; Alfred Li; Jennifer W Liu; Simon Y Tang; Grace D O'Connell; Jean D Sibonga; Joshua S Alwood; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.