Literature DB >> 17588588

Detection of trabecular bone microdamage by micro-computed tomography.

Xiang Wang1, Daniel B Masse, Huijie Leng, Kevin P Hess, Ryan D Ross, Ryan K Roeder, Glen L Niebur.   

Abstract

Microdamage is an important component of bone quality and affects bone remodeling. Improved techniques to assess microdamage without the need for histological sectioning would provide insight into the role of microdamage in trabecular bone strength by allowing the spatial distribution of damage within the trabecular microstructure to be measured. Nineteen cylindrical trabecular bone specimens were prepared and assigned to two groups. The specimens in group I were damaged to 3% compressive strain and labeled with BaSO(4). Group II was not loaded, but was labeled with BaSO(4). Micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT) images of the specimens were obtained at 10 microm resolution. The median intensity of the treated bone tissue was compared between groups. Thresholding was also used to measure the damaged area fraction in the micro-CT scans. The histologically measured damaged area fraction, the median CT intensity, and the micro-CT measured damaged area fraction were all higher in the loaded group than in the unloaded group, indicating that the micro-CT images could differentiate the damaged specimen group from the unloaded specimens. The histologically measured damaged area fraction was positively correlated with the micro-CT measured damaged area fraction and with the median CT intensity of the bone, indicating that the micro-CT images can detect microdamage in trabecular bone with sufficient accuracy to differentiate damage levels between samples. This technique provides a means to non-invasively assess the three-dimensional distribution of microdamage within trabecular bone test specimens and could be used to gain insight into the role of trabecular architecture in microdamage formation.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17588588      PMCID: PMC2098869          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  19 in total

1.  Nonlinear behavior of trabecular bone at small strains.

Authors:  E F Morgan; O C Yeh; W C Chang; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Three-dimensional morphometry of the L6 vertebra in the ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis: biomechanical implications.

Authors:  J H Kinney; D L Haupt; M Balooch; A J Ladd; J T Ryaby; N E Lane
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Microdamage accumulation in bovine trabecular bone in uniaxial compression.

Authors:  T L Arthur Moore; L J Gibson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Preparation of on-axis cylindrical trabecular bone specimens using micro-CT imaging.

Authors:  Xiang Wang; Xiangyi Liu; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Validity of the bulk-staining technique to separate artifactual from in vivo bone microdamage.

Authors:  D B Burr; T Stafford
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Examination of compact bone microdamage using back-scattered electron microscopy.

Authors:  M B Schaffler; W C Pitchford; K Choi; J M Riddle
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage.

Authors:  D B Burr; R B Martin; M B Schaffler; E L Radin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Synthesis and evaluation of potential CT (computer tomography) contrast agents for bone structure and microdamage analysis.

Authors:  Raman Parkesh; Wolfgang Gowin; T Clive Lee; Thorfinnur Gunnlaugsson
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Cancellous bone microdamage in the proximal femur: influence of age and osteoarthritis on damage morphology and regional distribution.

Authors:  N L Fazzalari; J S Kuliwaba; M R Forwood
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  Detecting microdamage in bone.

Authors:  T C Lee; S Mohsin; D Taylor; R Parkesh; T Gunnlaugsson; F J O'Brien; M Giehl; W Gowin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.610

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Multiscale imaging of bone microdamage.

Authors:  Atharva A Poundarik; Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.417

2.  Micro-computed tomography of fatigue microdamage in cortical bone using a barium sulfate contrast agent.

Authors:  Huijie Leng; Xiang Wang; Ryan D Ross; Glen L Niebur; Ryan K Roeder
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2008-01

Review 3.  Alendronate-related femoral diaphysis fracture--what should be done to predict and prevent subsequent fracture of the contralateral side?

Authors:  M H Edwards; F C McCrae; S A Young-Min
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Methodological approach for the detection of both microdamage and fluorochrome labels in ewe bone and human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Brigitte Burt-Pichat; Hélène Follet; Gwendoline Toulemonde; Monique Arlot; Pierre Delmas; Roland Chapurlat
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Mechanical failure begins preferentially near resorption cavities in human vertebral cancellous bone under compression.

Authors:  C R Slyfield; E V Tkachenko; S E Fischer; K M Ehlert; I H Yi; M G Jekir; R G O'Brien; T M Keaveny; C J Hernandez
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Structural and mechanical repair of diffuse damage in cortical bone in vivo.

Authors:  Zeynep Seref-Ferlengez; Jelena Basta-Pljakic; Oran D Kennedy; Claudy J Philemon; Mitchell B Schaffler
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Bone quality assessment techniques: geometric, compositional, and mechanical characterization from macroscale to nanoscale.

Authors:  Heather B Hunt; Eve Donnelly
Journal:  Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-08-22

8.  Effects of loading orientation on the morphology of the predicted yielded regions in trabecular bone.

Authors:  Xiutao Shi; Xiang Wang; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 9.  X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents.

Authors:  Hrvoje Lusic; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 10.  Medial tibial stress syndrome: a critical review.

Authors:  Maarten H Moen; Johannes L Tol; Adam Weir; Miriam Steunebrink; Theodorus C De Winter
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.