Literature DB >> 11273430

New common federal definition of research misconduct in the United States.

S J Bird1, A K Dustira.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11273430     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-000-0030-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: what has and has not been accomplished?

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Developing a federal policy on research misconduct.

Authors:  Sybil Francis
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.

Authors:  Chris B Pascal
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. Government's attempt to define research misconduct.

Authors:  David H Guston
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  "Serious deviation from accepted practices.

Authors:  Donald E Buzzelli
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.525

  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Seven ways to plagiarize: handling real allegations of research misconduct.

Authors:  Michael C Loui
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Promoting Ethics and Integrity in Management Academic Research: Retraction Initiative.

Authors:  Freida Ozavize Ayodele; Liu Yao; Hasnah Haron
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.525

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.