Literature DB >> 29441445

Promoting Ethics and Integrity in Management Academic Research: Retraction Initiative.

Freida Ozavize Ayodele1, Liu Yao2,3, Hasnah Haron2,3.   

Abstract

In the management academic research, academic advancement, job security, and the securing of research funds at one's university are judged mainly by one's output of publications in high impact journals. With bogus resumes filled with published journal articles, universities and other allied institutions are keen to recruit or sustain the appointment of such academics. This often places undue pressure on aspiring academics and on those already recruited to engage in research misconduct which often leads to research integrity. This structured review focuses on the ethics and integrity of management research through an analysis of retracted articles published from 2005 to 2016. The study employs a structured literature review methodology whereby retracted articles published between 2005 and 2016 in the field of management science were found using Crossref and Google Scholar. The searched articles were then streamlined by selecting articles based on their relevance and content in accordance with the inclusion criteria. Based on the analysed retracted articles, the study shows evidence of ethical misconduct among researchers of management science. Such misconduct includes data falsification, the duplication of submitted articles, plagiarism, data irregularity and incomplete citation practices. Interestingly, the analysed results indicate that the field of knowledge management includes the highest number of retracted articles, with plagiarism constituting the most significant ethical issue. Furthermore, the findings of this study show that ethical misconduct is not restricted to a particular geographic location; it occurs in numerous countries. In turn, avenues of further study on research misconduct in management research are proposed.

Keywords:  Ethics; Integrity; Management academic research; Misconducts; Structured review analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29441445     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9941-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  8 in total

1.  New common federal definition of research misconduct in the United States.

Authors:  S J Bird; A K Dustira
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Research misconduct: a grand global challenge for the 21st Century.

Authors:  Michael J G Farthing
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 4.  Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys.

Authors:  Vanja Pupovac; Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.

Authors:  Justin L Hess; Grant Fore
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; R Grant Steen; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli; Rodrigo Costas; Vincent Larivière
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies.

Authors:  Salman Y Guraya; Robert I Norman; Khalid I Khoshhal; Shaista Salman Guraya; Antonello Forgione
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.