Literature DB >> 11657864

Developing a federal policy on research misconduct.

Sybil Francis.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Commission on Research Integrity; Legal Approach; Office of Science and Technology Policy; U.S. Congress

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 11657864     DOI： 10.1007/s11948-999-0017-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN： 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Deception in scientific research.

Authors:  Patricia K Woolf
Journal:  Jurimetrics       Date:  1988

2.  Allocating credit and blame in science.

Authors:  Daryl E Chubin
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  1988 Winter-Spring

3.  What is misconduct in science?

Authors:  H K Schachman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-07-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The definition of misconduct in science: a view from NSF.

Authors:  D E Buzzelli
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-01-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Policy development lessons from two federal initiatives: protecting human research subjects and handling misconduct in science.

Authors:  J P Porter; A K Dustira
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Coll Dent       Date:  2014
  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  New common federal definition of research misconduct in the United States.

Authors:  S J Bird; A K Dustira
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends.

Authors:  Barbara Mishkin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Commentary: Legacy of the Commission on Research Integrity.

Authors:  Barbara K Redman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.525
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.