Literature DB >> 11657856

The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.

Chris B Pascal.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Legal Approach; National Institutes of Health; Office of Research Integrity; Public Health Service

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 11657856     DOI： 10.1007/s11948-999-0008-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN： 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Scientific misconduct. Baylor saga comes to an end.

Authors:  J Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The federal role in influencing research ethics education and standards in science.

Authors:  A K Dustira
Journal:  Prof Ethics       Date:  1996 Spring-Summer

3.  Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1989-08-08

4.  Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision.

Authors:  R Dresser
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  The aftermath of the Gallo case.

Authors:  C Anderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-01-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  PHS perspectives on misconduct in science.

Authors:  E N Brandt
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792
  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  New common federal definition of research misconduct in the United States.

Authors:  S J Bird; A K Dustira
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal)

Authors:  Daryl E Chubin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  The university and the responsible conduct of research: who is responsible for what?

Authors:  Katherine Alfredo; Hillary Hart
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct.

Authors:  Anne Victoria Neale; Justin Northrup; Rhonda Dailey; Ellen Marks; Judith Abrams
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 5.  The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.

Authors:  Felicitas Hesselmann; Verena Graf; Marion Schmidt; Martin Reinhart
Journal:  Curr Sociol       Date:  2016-10-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.